Jump to content

Taxpayers to dig for £20M for Liverpool Dock


Non-Believer

Recommended Posts

Looks like they did do an initial test borehole at 10m to bedrock.

The first two pilings have gone in at 12m to hit bedrock.  That's not too bad and relatively close.  The test holes for the dolphins are also at 13m.

However two more holes have been at 15m & 17m.  That's a significant difference from 10 - 17m.  It about the height of an average house. 

Seems their test hole must have hit some sort of peak and the last two holes are in a serious trough. 

It's pretty weird though having such variances over such a small area and the one test hole being the shallowest of all.  The whole mooring/drilling area is only about 50 sq m. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Phantom said:

 

It's pretty weird though having such variances over such a small area and the one test hole being the shallowest of all.  The whole mooring/drilling area is only about 50 sq m. 

Yes, but look at the rock structures around that area, pretty craggy. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gladys said:

Yes, but look at the rock structures around that area, pretty craggy. 

I'm beginning to think we live on Craggy Island, given some of the comedians government seem to employ.

The costs seem to just go on, go on, go on, go on, go on...

...go on.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Albert Tatlock said:

I'm beginning to think we live on Craggy Island, given some of the comedians government seem to employ.

The costs seem to just go on, go on, go on, go on, go on...

...go on.

I've seen a lost and flustered Alf in the M&S lingerie dept. 

 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Non-Believer said:

The original cost estimate for this work was £6.61M.

What is now the estimated time of completion?

Strains of Liverpool Terminal....

Depends which original cost is your starting point.

The 3.2 million original cost of the new 6.6 million original cost.

https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/cost-unclear-for-plans-to-extend-king-edward-viii-pier/

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gladys said:

Yes, but look at the rock structures around that area, pretty craggy. 

They've either been working off out-of-date surveys or they didn't bother to do a couple of runs along that area with geophys. Geophys is clever stuff these days.

Edited by Andy Onchan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Albert Tatlock said:

I'm beginning to think we live on Craggy Island, given some of the comedians government seem to employ.

The costs seem to just go on, go on, go on, go on, go on...

...go on.

Fraggle Rock.....

Screenshot_20240309-233306_Facebook.jpg

Edited by Non-Believer
screenshot
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might have been cheaper to buy a smaller boat in the end. You know one that would have worked in the harbours as they were.

Funny how technology can find oil and gas hundreds of meters below the sea bed in the middle of an ocean but couldn't find voids in a harbour within a few metres of a harbour wall?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Phantom said:

Looks like they did do an initial test borehole at 10m to bedrock.

The first two pilings have gone in at 12m to hit bedrock.  That's not too bad and relatively close.  The test holes for the dolphins are also at 13m.

However two more holes have been at 15m & 17m.  That's a significant difference from 10 - 17m.  It about the height of an average house. 

Seems their test hole must have hit some sort of peak and the last two holes are in a serious trough. 

It's pretty weird though having such variances over such a small area and the one test hole being the shallowest of all.  The whole mooring/drilling area is only about 50 sq m. 

Maybe they didn't take the tidal variation into account 🤣

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...