Jump to content

Taxpayers to dig for £20M for Liverpool Dock


Non-Believer

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, b4mbi said:

 

https://www.gov.im/media/1348386/guide-to-the-user-agreement.pdf

The King Edward pier linkspan always been govt owned

manannan Victoria pier linkspan, which is what I was referring to  was owned by IOMSPC until IOMG bought the company.

There have been two linkspans on Edward Pier, the first was on the south side and was built by and belonged to SPCo. That dated to approx 1983/4 to accommodate the ill fated Monas Isle. 

That was later removed and replaced by the IoMG owned one on the north side. That was in 1994/5 and it’s installation was tied in with the first user agreement as IoMG had wanted to control at least one ro-ro berthing ramp.

Id got confused about the Victoria Pier Ramp, where the new road way pier built in 1977 was government owned but the ramp itself belonged to Manx Line and came into Steam Packet ownership on the merger.

Ive a memory that the 1977 Pier/Roadway was originally known as Queen Elizabeth Pier/Quay, rather than Victoria Pier link span, but that name seems to have dropped out of use. It was clearly a separate structure before filling in of Circus Beach and infill underneath the Sea Terminal, much of which was on “stilts”.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks as though he was correct.

https://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/steam-packet-chairman-lambasts-design-of-liverpool-ferry-terminal-241134

Building materials have increased by about 35% since Covid so why has the increase to date over 84% which will rise to 110% should they vote through the extra £10m.  Nobody in government seemingly having the balls to put a brake on this

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Passing Time said:

looks as though he was correct.

https://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/steam-packet-chairman-lambasts-design-of-liverpool-ferry-terminal-241134

Building materials have increased by about 35% since Covid so why has the increase to date over 84% which will rise to 110% should they vote through the extra £10m.  Nobody in government seemingly having the balls to put a brake on this

You can't 'put a brake' on a contractual agreement. The damage was done years ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Passing Time said:

looks as though he was correct.

https://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/steam-packet-chairman-lambasts-design-of-liverpool-ferry-terminal-241134

Building materials have increased by about 35% since Covid so why has the increase to date over 84% which will rise to 110% should they vote through the extra £10m.  Nobody in government seemingly having the balls to put a brake on this

The Steam Packet mans is quite scathing of AECOM. I hope he has his facts right. They are well known for chasing anyone who questions their ability and standard of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Two-lane said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-isle-of-man-66258896

Bid for additional Manx ferry terminal contingency funding on hold

There's a piece on this on Manx Radio too:

https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/people-are-right-to-be-frustrated-at-soaring-cost-of-liverpool-terminal/

and an interview with Watterson.  Interestingly he says the PAC report should be published over the Summer.

But does anyone think they'll stop spending and wait?

Edited to add:  The BBC's linked stories remind us that exactly the same thing happened almost exactly two years ago - when the cost was only supposed to be £38 million.  That went well.

Edited by Roger Mexico
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, doc.fixit said:

According to the Courier today the new terminal is going to be a maternity hospital!

............ 'to finish the work in time for birthing trials in the spring'..........

At least that's what I think they meant. 🤣

Well, we've certainly been f*cked quite a few times over this - so it wouldn't surprise me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roger Mexico said:

There's a piece on this on Manx Radio too:

https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/people-are-right-to-be-frustrated-at-soaring-cost-of-liverpool-terminal/

and an interview with Watterson.  Interestingly he says the PAC report should be published over the Summer.

But does anyone think they'll stop spending and wait?

Edited to add:  The BBC's linked stories remind us that exactly the same thing happened almost exactly two years ago - when the cost was only supposed to be £38 million.  That went well.

No. There is no option in the contract to 'stop spending and wait'!. If anyone thinks holding back that contingency money is going to have any effect, dream on. It'll have to be paid. The money will have to come from somewhere. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Happier diner said:

No. There is no option in the contract to 'stop spending and wait'!. If anyone thinks holding back that contingency money is going to have any effect, dream on. It'll have to be paid. The money will have to come from somewhere. 

These dickheads salaries/pensions then!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Happier diner said:

No. There is no option in the contract to 'stop spending and wait'!. If anyone thinks holding back that contingency money is going to have any effect, dream on. It'll have to be paid. The money will have to come from somewhere. 

Really? So we entered into a contract with unlimited liability  with no break clauses? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there were get out clauses, then perhaps, in the early days they could have been used, still a loss but not as much as the overall cost!!! But someone would have had to admit to a mistake?

However, Liverpools requirement for a 'cruise ship berth' still meant we would ahve lost the old Manx berth?

Doesn't seem like the cruise ship berth is going to happen???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...