Jump to content

Taxpayers to dig for £20M for Liverpool Dock


Non-Believer

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Banker said:

For such a know it all and expert you are a bit slow on this. It has already been mentioned. There has been lots on social media. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 2112 said:

For such a know it all and expert you are a bit slow on this. It has already been mentioned. There has been lots on social media. 

But to be fair to @Banker, NMM ( Nations Moaning Mouthpiece ) @2112, that’s the  first article reporting that loser Morris wanted IoMG to pay, in part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, John Wright said:

But to be fair to @Banker, NMM ( Nations Moaning Mouthpiece ) @2112, that’s the  first article reporting that loser Morris wanted IoMG to pay, in part.

Peel Ports should refurbish the passenger facilities, but knowing IOMG and its ineptitude, I would imagine the GMP would end up paying, like Liverpool. I thought that the passenger terminal only a few years ago, had considerable investment, redecorating etc and new toilet facilities. Who paid, Peel Ports, SPCo or IOMG? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, 2112 said:

Peel Ports should refurbish the passenger facilities, but knowing IOMG and its ineptitude, I would imagine the GMP would end up paying, like Liverpool. I thought that the passenger terminal only a few years ago, had considerable investment, redecorating etc and new toilet facilities. Who paid, Peel Ports, SPCo or IOMG? 

You’re such a know it all, surprised you don’t know!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 2112 said:

Peel Ports should refurbish the passenger facilities, but knowing IOMG and its ineptitude, I would imagine the GMP would end up paying, like Liverpool. I thought that the passenger terminal only a few years ago, had considerable investment, redecorating etc and new toilet facilities. Who paid, Peel Ports, SPCo or IOMG? 

That rather depends on whether PP charge a fee to IoMSPCo per sailing or passenger, for its use, or whether IoMSPCo have a lease.
 

if the former, and PP do work, they’ll increase the fee, if the latter SPCo will want to recoup their outlay. Either way passengers will pay, as they do now, at both Heysham and Liverpool. 

Liverpool the SPCo had a lease on the floating landing stage.

Heysham passenger terminal building is perfectly adequate for the limited numbers who use it. Most passengers don’t. They sit in their cars. But you’re right, it was done up just before the covid pandemic. 

However, the rest of the Harbour facilities are pretty grim, Station facilities non existent. They could do with tarting up. But then having travelled through places like Cork ( Ringaskiddy ), Rosslare Harbour, Genoa, Civitavecchia, Santander, Ancona, Belfast, Igoumenitsa, Barcelona, Holyhead, in the last two years ( as well as Dublin, Liverpool, Santander ) Heysham is nowhere near the bottom of the list for either facilities or infrastructure. In fact it’s pretty near the top.

Where it fails is geographic location closeness to a larger centre of population, with decent shops, hotels, restaurants. But even then it’s not the worst.

Most commercial ports are industrial wasteland shitholes. They’re geared to what makes money ( freight ).  The problem with Heysham is, if you’re a foot passenger, it’s isolated. But then so are Ringaskiddy, Rosslare, no hotels or shops in case of emergency,. You can’t walk into town. But then, apart from Ancona, Igoumenitsa, Santander, or Liverpool I wouldn’t want to exit on foot to get to the nearby city centre. The road network wouldn’t be safe. But at least they’re a comparatively short taxi ride away.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, John Wright said:

Most commercial ports are industrial wasteland shitholes. They’re geared to what makes money ( freight ).  The problem with Heysham is, if you’re a foot passenger, it’s isolated. But then so are Ringaskiddy, Rosslare, no hotels or shops in case of emergency,. You can’t walk into town. 

Granted, Ringaskiddy is a little out of the way, but the Ferry Boat Inn is not too far away, and welcoming. Probably not much further than the Duke of Rothesay is to Heysham Port.

What makes Ringaskiddy is the added quality of the air, which allegedly keeps all the locals happy - there's a Viagra factory just down the road! 🤩

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
6 minutes ago, cissolt said:

https://gef.im/news/politics/original-estimates-for-terminal-were-optimistic-41915/

The committee has also concluded that ‘it is hard to provide a value for money assessment for this project’ and that ‘it is almost impossible to know, even with the benefit of hindsight, whether the right amount of money has been spent’.

 

so does it tell us who committed us to such a huge expense ? sounds like a whitewash   with lessons being learned 

 

7 minutes ago, cissolt said:

https://gef.im/news/politics/original-estimates-for-terminal-were-optimistic-41915/

The committee has also concluded that ‘it is hard to provide a value for money assessment for this project’ and that ‘it is almost impossible to know, even with the benefit of hindsight, whether the right amount of money has been spent’.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"An assessment of the skills available to Government, in DOI and other
contracting Departments, to identify where expert advisors would be of benefit
throughout the lifecycle of a project, should be part of the work undertaken
before any project, with a high degree of speciality, is brought to Tynwald for
approval."

"An assessment of the skills available to Government" - who is competent to make that assessment.

It does not seem to me to be a summary that says anything new or surprising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Omobono said:

so does it tell us who committed us to such a huge expense ? sounds like a whitewash   with lessons being learned 

Didn't Allinson previously promise the Manx Public that names would be named?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It took 5 years before a group was set up to provide political oversight? 

Im sure the DOI happy guy will be on shortly to tell us about how these contracts work and enlighten us as to how the budget was allowed to increase to nearly £100 million.  It was 70 million in 2021, covid only accounted for a £4 million increase.

Screenshot_2023-11-15-16-10-35-29_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.thumb.jpg.64f4e78a3db36483d5add1fd519ff555.jpg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Omobono said:

so does it tell us who committed us to such a huge expense ? sounds like a whitewash   with lessons being learned 

Did you expect anything else ?

PAC like being savaged by your favourite carpet slippers ! Just keep on spending the taxpayers cash boys until there isn't any !

Edited by asitis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...