Jump to content

Taxpayers to dig for £20M for Liverpool Dock


Non-Believer

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, asitis said:

Posters have spoken above about how we don't have experts in this that and the other, and failings weren't identified. My view would be, at some point we shouldn't have needed experts, we didn't need consultants, we just needed someone with common sense. This person/s would have been able to see that a non freight port, costing god knows how much, with upkeep, looking at it's glass, dredging etc etc was going to be expensive, made no sense at all. This project has been like many here where it assumes a life of it's own (power station, airport etc) and dissenters cannot possibly be correct. Of course one would assume that this is why we elect sensible people to be MHK's and at least have common sense if not specialist knowledge !

Sensible people to be MHKs - didn’t the voters of Douglas North vote in - Professor Dr David Ashford MHK, MBE etc. and look where it has got us.  A world class supreme expert on every subject - who needs consultants? 
 

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 2112 said:

Sensible people to be MHKs - didn’t the voters of Douglas North vote in - Professor Dr David Ashford MHK, MBE etc. and look where it has got us.  A world class supreme expert on every subject - who needs consultants? 
 

 

But minus zero common sense ….

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, 2112 said:

It hasn’t taken Minister Tim long to trot out the lessons will be learned mantra. The NPM headline says ‘government has very expensive lessons to learn’. 

MR also asked Mr Crookall as to who will be held accountable.

Mr Crookall replied, "Ummm, Errr, Ahhh, I'll get back to you"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Happier diner said:

It won't stop at that. It will be over £100M you mark my words.

A great many people, me included, think that it already is, Hooper thought so and that was 2 years ago. This extra £10M will see it heading towards £120M, I'd suggest that PAC bandying £70M around is just political damage limitation.

ETA Mr Turner also has strong opinions...

 

Screenshot_20231120-140451_Facebook.jpg

Edited by Non-Believer
Typo & screenshots
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a 30year comeover, and for the last thirty years the phrase "lessons will be learned" has been trotted out Ad Nauseam !

FFS how long does it take to learn a lesson, or perhaps more pertinently, how much public money does it take !

I can accept that our elected have perhaps inherited this problem and therefore strangely for me I don't blame them, however I do expect them to remove the power from the CS to do this again, if that is what they will have us believe.

It requires huge reform of HR who appoint absolute incompetents to positions of power and huge reform across the CS and politically before we are truly finished, surely someone we elected can see this !

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, quilp said:

It was asked for in July:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-isle-of-man-66196397#:~:text=The cost of the project had already doubled,to approve the transfer from reserves next week.

but the decision was put off until now. Maybe they thought the problem would disappear in the meantime.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...