Jump to content

rising anti semitism nipped in the bud thank god


Recommended Posts

This is an odd turn to the thread that I have arrived late to. Are we seriously suggesting that anti-semitic attacks by Muslims are not a growing problem across Europe? I would have thought by now that this is established fact.

Are the attacks predominantly by Muslims?

 

I would have expected the regressive left to be a more dominant demographic in this sort of mindless thuggery, along with the standard hard right anti Semitism. A bit of vandalism and graffiti plus the occasional mugging, in their mentality, is definitely giving it back for the Palestinians.

 

As ever at the extremes the left and right merge to violent thuggery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I will happily state categorically there is no god

For many people God is a metaphor for what is inherently unknowable and for those things which are otherwise impossible to enunciate. No less meaningful or real than the magical fairy concept of God and not necessarily at odds with tradition, culture or ritual. For some people this is an unconscious concept of God. But it is also a high theo/logical position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do the people who have an "unconscious concept of god", know it?

Many people who would likely consider themselves believers in fact have an unconsciously metaphorical concept of God. They don't think of it as a metaphorical position. But they don't really believe - although they they can picture it.

 

Equally the non-god God, God as a metaphor, is a strong theological concept - a conscious position and perhaps the logical end point of theology and philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will happily state categorically there is no god. And we do know quite a bit about the nature of our existence. What lead to the state of affairs we are in is evolution. We are all worthy.

It is a theory, nothing more. And what created the situation before evolution started? What created the embryonic universe? You cannot state anything on the subject categorically, because like the rest of us, you just don't know. Even Einstein didn't know, and he was the man. You can say what you believe and don't believe because it's subjective to you. That is a long way, in fact 100% away, from asserting it as a fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The success of Christianity is not the quality of its words, but the quality of the violence behind its words.

That sounds like a clever slogan but it doesn't really add much and it's not historically accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is interesting and let's see if Richard will think about this.

 

The spread of Christianity isn't that different from the spread of Islam - both had elements of violence, both had state and quasi-state support and both used their cultural and technological superiority to colonize native people's into their religion - especially in South America in the case of Christianity and especially in South and East Asia in the case of Islam.

 

But beyond all the headlining history of battles and invasions there was a far slower and nuanced story of cultural change and the mother's knee.

 

To claim the Amish are Christians due to the quality of Christianity's violence is simplistic sloganeering, as would be a claim Indonesia was converted by the sword.

 

Richard, I suspect you would emphasize the West's influence in Islam's violence and talk about the organic and broadly personal conversion which was the dominant source of Islam's spread eastwards.

 

If that is the case don't turn a blind eye to the same process within Christianity.

 

Both were the religions of the dominant, urban culture and they spread into traditional societies as agriculture settled the countryside.

 

That process is a huge cultural change, and yes there were colonial and religious violence as a part of it, but it wasn't nearly as simplistic as conversion by the sword with either religion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Armish are an end result of the chain of events - although American branches of Christianity are a result of "invasive" expansionism of the Americas.

 

The godless heathen Native Americans were given the same choice the Romans gave others...assimilate and convert or be destroyed.

 

If Constantine 1 hadn't converted, Christianity would not have spread as it had (possibly even dying out the way old religions do).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was advised by an old Jewish scholar that Constantine accepted that those of the Jewish faith who would not convert and they were tolerated but denied some of the 'financial freedoms' of the Christians. He claimed that the Jews were considered to be the 'property' of the Emperor.

 

Now I don't know enough to categorically state this is correct but this was his take on historyflowers.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an odd turn to the thread that I have arrived late to. Are we seriously suggesting that anti-semitic attacks by Muslims are not a growing problem across Europe? I would have thought by now that this is established fact.

I frequently visit the Jewish community in the UK and can assure everyone that antisemitic attacks including daily verbal abuse and bomb threats are very much on the rise and equally unreported in the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TJ stop talking crap. You just embarrass yourself when you post in multiple sock puppets and pretend they are different people. You are very transparent and it simply doesn't work.

I repeat: Skeletor has nothing to do with me and I can safely say he or she is not TJ either. Anyone can go on here pretending to be others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...