woody2 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 15 minutes ago, mojomonkey said: Crikey, that's not what I asked. Not sure I can make it any simpler to understand but I'll try. Do you accept that the statement made earlier (allegedly by the BBC, though not actually referenced) has subsequently been shown to be incorrect? can i suggest you contact the ministry of the interior who released the statement........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Just now, woody2 said: can i suggest you contact the ministry of the interior who released the statement........ Why, do they represent you? I am asking whether YOU accept that the statement made earlier has been subsequently shown to be incorrect? I don't actually know why you find it so hard to accept something that has been evidently demonstrated. Arguing semantics and not answering the actual question is much sillier than actually just accepting the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 18 minutes ago, Tarne said: But it's wrong. You've been presented with new evidence but you are sticking to the wrong. Erm - Registered voters: 47,568,588. Voted for one or other of the candidates: 31,397,916. Did not vote for either candidate: 16,170,672. I presume someone is capable of doing some basic percentages with this data? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 you may as well woody, it's hard to see how you can make yourself look less silly than you do now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Think you need to check the numbers there Stinky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Just now, mojomonkey said: Why, do they represent you? I am asking whether YOU accept that the statement made earlier has been subsequently shown to be incorrect? I don't actually know why you find it so hard to accept something that has been evidently demonstrated. Arguing semantics and not answering the actual question is much sillier than actually just accepting the point. it was the facts at the time of posting just as the low turnout post was, should madron not of celebrated when this statement was made?should the police not of gassed the nf supporters? the breakdown at the time was as i have stated and it still stand that 1/3 didn't support either candidate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 no i don't. i'm just going by what mojo said. i think you should contact him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, the stinking enigma said: you may as well woody, it's hard to see how you can make yourself look less silly than you do now maths not your strong point...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 1 minute ago, woody2 said: maths not your strong point...... sadly, yes it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 #phoenixfromtheflamestard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 #woody2winsagain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman1980 Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 So Austria, The Netherlands and now France have all rejected right wing, nationalist candidates. What does this mean for the alleged fall of the EU? I am fairly certain that some on here predicted that one the UK voted to leave then the rest would follow. It appears that our European cousins have resolutely backed the EU even with all its faults. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 16 minutes ago, manxman1980 said: So Austria, The Netherlands and now France have all rejected right wing, nationalist candidates. What does this mean for the alleged fall of the EU? I am fairly certain that some on here predicted that one the UK voted to leave then the rest would follow. It appears that our European cousins have resolutely backed the EU even with all its faults. Give it time. The French results, as in The Netherlands and Austria show a sizable amount of those populations voted for the Nationalists. And those people/voters aren't just going to fade away. Neither are the cultural problems that enabled their rise and fervour in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llap Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 Clearly if you compare accurate scientific polls with the election result, there was enormous voter fraud. Le Pen is the true president of France. That creep, Macron, is a pretender and should be arrested for treason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llap Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 26 minutes ago, manxman1980 said: So Austria, The Netherlands and now France have all rejected right wing, nationalist candidates. What does this mean for the alleged fall of the EU? I am fairly certain that some on here predicted that one the UK voted to leave then the rest would follow. It appears that our European cousins have resolutely backed the EU even with all its faults. We went head to head against Hitler, alone, defending freedom from fascism, and we can do it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.