Jump to content

Flybe nosedives on profits warning


Andy Onchan

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Giggleberrys said:

I guess that would be cost prohibitive

Not necessarily so. Factor out a lot of things like airport opening, transfer times, and even down to be able to lift directly from a scene to a NW Centre of excellence and the investment makes more sense.

2 hours ago, Major Rushen said:

Helicopters are limited by weather more than fixed wing.

You’d be surprised. The H145 is a massively resilient airframe. The Cayman Islands have two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Derek Flint said:

Not necessarily so. Factor out a lot of things like airport opening, transfer times, and even down to be able to lift directly from a scene to a NW Centre of excellence and the investment makes more sense.

You’d be surprised. The H145 is a massively resilient airframe. The Cayman Islands have two.

We still have to pay the airport staff and facilities. Most of the time patients are better being stabilised before transfer to a centre of excellence. IOM ambulance response times are good. A full time helicopter, with proper crew cover, maintenance, is a very expensive luxury.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, John Wright said:

We still have to pay the airport staff and facilities. Most of the time patients are better being stabilised before transfer to a centre of excellence. IOM ambulance response times are good. A full time helicopter, with proper crew cover, maintenance, is a very expensive luxury.

Two it is then!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, John Wright said:

We still have to pay the airport staff and facilities. Most of the time patients are better being stabilised before transfer to a centre of excellence. IOM ambulance response times are good. A full time helicopter, with proper crew cover, maintenance, is a very expensive luxury.

Not according to senior ED staff. In most cases a decision at the scene can have them at the very best Centre in reach of the golden hour.

running from the pad at Nobles, with bunkered fuel means you don’t have to fire up ATC, Fire Etc if there is a flight to be made after hours. And because you are operating pad to pad, there is literally hours saved at both. Ends

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Derek Flint said:

Not according to senior ED staff. In most cases a decision at the scene can have them at the very best Centre in reach of the golden hour.

running from the pad at Nobles, with bunkered fuel means you don’t have to fire up ATC, Fire Etc if there is a flight to be made after hours. And because you are operating pad to pad, there is literally hours saved at both. Ends

Do most of the places we use across have a landing pad? No! So where are they going to land?  
 

What has been the demand outside Ronaldsway ATC opening hours. Are most emergency patient transfers a&e casualties from a community event, or from patients who have been previously admitted and deteriorated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John Wright said:

Do most of the places we use across have a landing pad? No! So where are they going to land?  
 

What has been the demand outside Ronaldsway ATC opening hours. Are most emergency patient transfers a&e casualties from a community event, or from patients who have been previously admitted and deteriorated.

 

https://www.thewaltoncentre.nhs.uk/News/361/first-air-ambulance-lands-on-major-trauma-helipad.html

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/7/2021 at 9:58 AM, Derek Flint said:

If they moved to a helicopter based service with something like an H145 it could work unrestricted from the pad at Nobles. 

I think this would require the pad(s) at the hospital to become licensed, this in itself may be costly and require additional legislation and facilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Derek Flint said:

Not necessarily so. Factor out a lot of things like airport opening, transfer times, and even down to be able to lift directly from a scene to a NW Centre of excellence and the investment makes more sense.

You’d be surprised. The H145 is a massively resilient airframe. The Cayman Islands have two.

Helicopters can operate in much lower visibility than fixed wing aircraft, visual flight rules for a helo means clear of cloud and in sight of the surface, for a fixed wing aircraft minimum in flight visibilities are required depending upon the classification of the airspace being flown in. Operating from the hospital would be done under VFR rules, so, if there was a fog which prevented fixed wing aircraft landing at the airport, a helicopter may well be able to at either the airport or the hospital.

I'm less certain of helicopter wind limitations - although as they don't need a runway, they could potentially always take off and land into wind which is normally the limiting factor for fixed wing aircraft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hillside said:

I think this would require the pad(s) at the hospital to become licensed, this in itself may be costly and require additional legislation and facilities.

Not so sure about that - air ambulances don't need to use licensed fields as far as I know. They certainly don't when they are attending incidents....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...