the stinking enigma Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Seems a bit of a counter intuitive thing to do really. To invite this level of public condemnation while also trying to appeal to citizens of the west that that he is in the right and that their forces are invading. Assad must be really really stupid and naughty and evil man. I know this because the daily mail told me. And their source- the syrian observatory for human rights- consisting of one man in a flat in the west midlands of all places, is impeccable. Once the SOHR states something, the mainstream media are free to repeat it without checking even. One man in a flat in the west midlands. It's pretty insulting really but we will lap it up. Must be quite a high block of flats the syrian observatory for human rights one member of staff lives in http://dailym.ai/2owkhBS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarne Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 If we hadn't done anything based on what's previously gone on, we're not going to do anything based on this. I mean, a quick google brings up numerous other chemical attacks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack being a really good example one from 2013. "How could we let this happen, isn't the UN meant to step in?" people cry, but the UN is nothing without a willing US behind it, and it's not going to play nice with the UN for a long time after their condemnations over Iraq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 Do you think assad is stupid enough to do it? I don't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 Even the daily mail commenters aren't swallowing the bullshit anymore. The daily mail. Yet you will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarne Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Swallow what, that there was a gas attack? I've no doubt gas has been used on both sides. It's an efficient and deadly way to kill lots of people in an area and doesn't discriminate on political affiliation or anything. The Daily Mail specifically denied the Ghouta attack too back in 2013 too, but the evidence is there. I'm not sure what your point is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 I think it is clear there was poison gas, but was it from a Syrian government aircraft, a Syrian government shell, an opposition chemical weapon's factory or what. The truth is so masked behind lies and interests it is impossible to know. What we can know is that Syria is a brutal place where hundreds of thousands have died caught between a regime which tortures, practices starvation and attacks hospitals, and zealots who will brutalize and enslave. With the great powers and their proxies adding to the misery. Pity the nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. One guy that lives in coventry and hasn't been to syria for 13 years. How much longer are we going to accept this bullshit? At what point do we ourselves become culpable to a degree? It's shameful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerrydandridge Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 This shows signs of near desperation by the global parasitical class to get western boots on the ground in Syria, can they at least not try a fresh style of false flag...Call Assad what you like but he is no idiot. You should of added "AGAIN!!" to the thread title... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 Cnn, fox bbc reuters. All quote the SOHR as their source. It's embarrassing. If it were a study on the sex life of the natterjack toad they would show more journalistic integrity before publishing. Jesus fucking christ almighty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 White House spokesman Sean Spicer says Assad did it, if that helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 It does. I'd like to take this opportunity to apologise to the guy in coventry and the daily mail, cnn, reuters and especially fox news for ever doubting them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 Assad wouldn't have done it had obama not double dared him http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/doanld-trump-syrian-civil-war-barack-obama-chemical-weapons-attack-idlib-khan-sheikhoun-sarin-gas-a7666721.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Stinky a bit ago you were castigating us for not caring for deaths in the Middle East. Just wondering how many of the children reported killed in SHRO you think were made up? SHRO is flawed, just like Iraq Body Count is flawed, but the are telling us something real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 Why would assad do it chinahand? I'm not disputing people died but why assad? And if you read spicers comments there will be plenty more to follow.. why would assad do this when he was winning anyway? Those that want regime change are the ones to "benefit" from this. Surely you can see that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Holy, personalization Batman. Assad isn't personally going around doing it all himself, Stinky. He controls a regime which is engaged in a barbaric no holds barred fight to the death. Morality has been abandoned by the combatants in Syria - there is huge evidence of a deliberate Kneel or Starve campaign targeting civilians and hospitals. Assad has given his country over to thugs, torturers, people who have no qualms attacking hospitals and bringing starvation to those who oppose them. Why do these people behave like this - because the world they have created is the worst dog eat dog world where those who oppose these thugs would likely treat them exactly the same way. Why would some colonel in the airforce order his pilots to bomb a hospital, or some intelligence chief build a torture dungeon where finger-nails and eyes and fingers are part of the detritus washed from the floor along with the bodies of those who succumb. You can personalize this and ask why would Assad bomb a hospital, why would Assad torture a teenager, why would Assad starve civilians. Is a member of his regime using a chemical weapon so unusual in an environment dominated by people desensitised to such barbarity. It has happened multiple times on all sides in this conflict. Maybe it wasn't someone from Assad's regime, maybe it was an Al Qaeda lab, but quite simply all sides in this tragedy are capable of this sort of behaviour. Do you really doubt that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.