P.K. Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Sure but you blow up a swag of sarin and you effectively destroy it. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-39500947 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llap Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 This does also seem to have benefited Trump quite well with dispelling his so called collusion's with the Russians..Apparently he gave the Russians and the Syrians an hour or twos notice and the exact location to be targeted. Gerrydandridge, I share in your concerns. I am hoping Trump is engaged in some brinkmanship we're not aware of. There is definitely more going on than you'll find out from arseholes like CNN or the BBC. Everyone, please REMAIN SKEPTICAL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 This does also seem to have benefited Trump quite well with dispelling his so called collusion's with the Russians..Apparently he gave the Russians and the Syrians an hour or twos notice and the exact location to be targeted. Gerrydandridge, I share in your concerns. I am hoping Trump is engaged in some brinkmanship we're not aware of. There is definitely more going on than you'll find out from arseholes like CNN or the BBC. Everyone, please REMAIN SKEPTICAL.Errr what concerns would they be? Errr the brinkmanship bit - who would that be with? The US and the Russkies are taking great pains to ensure that they don't clash over this. Errr you can't possibly know that more is going on than reported by the communist apologist that is the BBC. Dear me.... ETA - I REMAIN SCEPTICAL over the Russian explanation on what took place. Does that count....? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerrydandridge Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 PK: you said earlier "However the US are intent on destroying ISIS", this is very naive of you to think this, have you ever considered that "However the Russians are intent on destroying ISIS" may be more accurate? I am starting to think that Trump has pulled the wool over his critics eyes with this, all these accusations of help from the Russians to get him elected and the so called relationship he has with them is now all but forgotten by the goldfish minded talking heads in the MSM. He sends a bunch of missiles onto a derelict airfield in Syria and his image is significantly repaired....I am not sure how many "beautiful babies" he saved with this action, but he sure has less critics at the moment. If its a False Flag then so far Trump has made the gains from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 PK: you said earlier "However the US are intent on destroying ISIS", this is very naive of you to think this, have you ever considered that "However the Russians are intent on destroying ISIS" may be more accurate? I am starting to think that Trump has pulled the wool over his critics eyes with this, all these accusations of help from the Russians to get him elected and the so called relationship he has with them is now all but forgotten by the goldfish minded talking heads in the MSM. He sends a bunch of missiles onto a derelict airfield in Syria and his image is significantly repaired....I am not sure how many "beautiful babies" he saved with this action, but he sure has less critics at the moment. If its a False Flag then so far Trump has made the gains from it. @Gerry I just have to ask this: Gerry, do you actually believe the nonsense you post up or is it that you get off on trying to promulgate bullshit? Because here in Reality Land your posts are viewed as being somewhat "off the wall" shall we say... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llap Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 I concur with Gerry's assessment of the situation. Why wouldn't he believe the completely reasonable and logical deduction he has posted? Sorry but it is you who is clearly viewing everything through a biased partisan lense and failing to grasp the wider picture or to arrive at logical evidence-based deductions of your own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 Because here in Reality Land Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 I concur with Gerry's assessment of the situation. Why wouldn't he believe the completely reasonable and logical deduction he has posted? Sorry but it is you who is clearly viewing everything through a biased partisan lense and failing to grasp the wider picture or to arrive at logical evidence-based deductions of your own. Now that's funny! But not exactly a surprise.... Because here in Reality Land OK - I concur that some posters on here can sometimes give MF a surreal quality all of it's own.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 10, 2017 Author Share Posted April 10, 2017 Your patriotism narrows your mind pk. Nothing to be ashamed of, that's the whole point to patriotism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 Your patriotism narrows your mind pk. Nothing to be ashamed of, that's the whole point to patriotism. Ahhh yes. The last refuge of a scoundrel.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 10, 2017 Author Share Posted April 10, 2017 I wouldn't go that far. I'd say you were more of a bounder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 I'll settle for cad if it's all the same to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paswt Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 I remember hearing that the difference between a 'cad' and a ' bounder' was that both would volunteer to fight for 'king and country' and then seduce the wife of their commanding officer , the bounder would then go to war and end up a' war hero', the cad would desert and never go to fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paswt Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 Only just seen your post PK , I wasn't having a 'pop' ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 They are both dishonourable individuals with the cad having a disposition to being more dishonourable to the ladies than anything else. ETA : I think! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.