manxb&b Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 28 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said: No different from Britain First... Well except for the Sharia law, subjugation of women, stoning gays and rape victims and generally taking the UK back to the stone age then I guess you're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Just now, manxb&b said: Well except for the Sharia law, subjugation of women, stoning gays and rape victims and generally taking the UK back to the stone age then I guess you're right. Yet they both spout bollocks, an extremely vocal minority claiming to speak for the majority. Shunned and mocked for their views by their respective communities. And I think you'll find the EDL/BF stance on women and gays not much better than them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuller K Rapp Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 False equivalency. Britain First are a tiny fringe group of morons with no power and no foreign links that I know of. Oh and they're not blowing people up, shooting them or running them down with vans. Radical Islamic extremists are supported by a majority of Muslim community, they are killing people, their leaders are generally quite intelligent, they have power over moderates in suppressing them, and they have foreign ties to extremist regimes such as Qatar. Even Saudi Arabia and its Arab allies in the region have broken ties with Qatar over their promotion of terrorism in the region and in the world as a whole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxb&b Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 8 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said: Yet they both spout bollocks, an extremely vocal minority claiming to speak for the majority. Shunned and mocked for their views by their respective communities. And I think you'll find the EDL/BF stance on women and gays not much better than them. Really, yet BF has Jayda Fransen as a leader (she's a women btw) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Just now, manxb&b said: Really, yet BF has Jayda Fransen as a leader (she's a women btw) Yeah, "The Fransen". Woman, maybe, lady, most certainly not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxb&b Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 3 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said: Yeah, "The Fransen". Woman, maybe, lady, most certainly not. Prefer your women in a Burka then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 48 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said: No different from Britain First... That comment says more about you than it says about either of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Just now, manxb&b said: Prefer your women in a Burka then? What ever you say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Just now, woolley said: That comment says more about you than it says about either of them. I condemn both of them for their hate speech and attempts to divide society for various reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuller K Rapp Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Just now, RIchard Britten said: I condemn both of them for their hate speech and attempts to divide society for various reasons. So do I. But one of them is a lot worse than the other in terms of violence against the public, a threat to national security, and in terms of wanting to bring about a change to society that would bring us back, as manxb&b said (I cite him in case you accuse me of being him), to the stone age. Britain First are nothing. Why even mention them, as I do not believe they have any connection to any terrorist attacks in London? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 1 minute ago, Fuller K Rapp said: So do I. But one of them is a lot worse than the other in terms of violence against the public, a threat to national security, and in terms of wanting to bring about a change to society that would bring us back, as manxb&b said (I cite him in case you accuse me of being him), to the stone age. Britain First are nothing. Why even mention them, as I do not believe they have any connection to any terrorist attacks in London? A street preacher/Golding standing on a street corner spouting bollocks are similar. Jo Cox's killer had links to BF (despite their best attempts to distance themselves from him). BF also has links to Irish Terrorism Groups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuller K Rapp Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Just now, RIchard Britten said: A street preacher/Golding standing on a street corner spouting bollocks are similar. Jo Cox's killer had links to BF (despite their best attempts to distance themselves from him). BF also has links to Irish Terrorism Groups. But what is your point here? Nobody disagrees with you about BF, so why bring them up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 5 minutes ago, Fuller K Rapp said: But what is your point here? Nobody disagrees with you about BF, so why bring them up? Someone posted a video of some nobody spouting rubbish about how things should be (according to him). I equated him to BF because they are the "white non-muslim" analogue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxb&b Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Don't think Jayda Fransen would pull a stunt like this though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuller K Rapp Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 1 minute ago, RIchard Britten said: Someone posted a video of some nobody spouting rubbish about how things should be (according to him). I equated him to BF because they are the "white non-muslim" analogue. Why do we need a "white non-muslim analogue"? By the way, you do realise Islam is a religion and Islamism is a political ideology? It is not a race. There are white people who are Muslim, both peaceful and terroristic, moderate and extremist. You need to let go of this narrative of Muslims being a racial group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.