RIchard Britten Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 8 minutes ago, Declan said: I don't understand the point you're making here. I believe it comes down to association guilt. Certain people with certain views, which are dangerously close to those exhibited by the likes of Jo Cox's Kill and this John Tomlin numpty are worried that they are going to be associated with them. And rather than acknowledge that their views are dangerously in line with those people, they attack others who point it out, like a defence mechanism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 12 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said: I believe it comes down to association guilt. Certain people with certain views, which are dangerously close to those exhibited by the likes of Jo Cox's Kill and this John Tomlin numpty are worried that they are going to be associated with them. But that would be as daft as expecting all Muslims to take the blame for ISIS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 5 hours ago, quilp said: White, christian self-loathing. You've a very tribal mentality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 8 minutes ago, Mr. Sausages said: You've a very tribal mentality. Otherwise known as human nature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 Typical Hutu comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hboy Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 4 minutes ago, Mr. Sausages said: Typical Hutu comment. Only a Tutsi would say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 4 hours ago, Declan said: I don't understand the point you're making here. The 'christian' comment was imprecise; he's an atheist after all. It's unnecessary to explain the thrust of my comment, and to be honest, I just can't be arsed. His reply to w2 was a thinly-disguised put-down designed to provoke? Unnecessary... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Mr. Sausages said: You've a very tribal mentality. And? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 4 hours ago, RIchard Britten said: I believe it comes down to association guilt. Certain people with certain views, which are dangerously close to those exhibited by the likes of Jo Cox's Kill and this John Tomlin numpty are worried that they are going to be associated with them. And rather than acknowledge that their views are dangerously in line with those people, they attack others who point it out, like a defence mechanism. What's this 'guilt' business, Rich? I have absolutely no affiliation with Jo Cox's killer or the acid-attacker. Both those extreme lunatics acted on their own twisted and psychopathic ideologies. Total mental cases. And I certainly am not "worried" that I'd be 'associated' with "them"; a pompous inference and really pushing the boat out but I recognise the tactic. "dangerously close to..." "dangerously in line with..." Nah. Not nice either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 hour ago, hboy said: Only a Tutsi would say that. you called Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 57 minutes ago, quilp said: And? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 19 hours ago, quilp said: I have absolutely no affiliation with Jo Cox's killer or the acid-attacker. Other than the right wing views certain posters share. The difference being some rant on endlessly on an anonymous internet forum persona and some take their views out physically on others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 23 hours ago, Declan said: But that would be as daft as expecting all Muslims to take the blame for ISIS. But it is the "right wing" that usually expect Muslims to "take the blame". Maybe the "right wing" should take responsibily for those within their ranks who commit these acts. Good for the goose and all that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 1 minute ago, RIchard Britten said: But it is the "right wing" that usually expect Muslims to "take the blame". Maybe the "right wing" should take responsibily for those within their ranks who commit these acts. Good for the goose and all that... Sounds like a spiral of stupidity to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 19 hours ago, quilp said: And I certainly am not "worried" that I'd be 'associated' with "them"; a pompous inference and really pushing the boat out but I recognise the tactic. "Muslims should be doing more to root out these bad apples in their midst" "Muslims should be protesting IS and decrying their actions" "Muslims should X" Change Muslim for "Right Wing" and you see the line of thinking... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.