2112 Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 4 hours ago, offshoremanxman said: For £66K a year I’d do it. You can get elected to the House of Keys at that salary and you can still make a dogs breakfast. 1 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 1 hour ago, Amadeus said: This real? Charming if so. Wow! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbnuts Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 29 minutes ago, Gladys said: Wow! Bit full of herself also then ! And gobby .. She's just talked herself out of my dating diary 🤣 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 It's probably worth preserving the sheer oddness of this job ad for posterity: A few random thoughts: If you are wanting domestic help in the Isle of Man, why do you advertise with a London agency? Who on earth is going to apply for a job with that enormous salary range and not think it's suspicious? If it is the Barrowmans why does it say Douglas when it's St Marks? If this is just about looking after the dogs, why specify someone who used to work as a housekeeper rather than is used to looking after dogs? What does 'weekend availability' mean - expected to work seven days a week? Calling 15 month old dogs 'puppies' seems a bit much, though authorities differ. If it is St Marks you'd think specifying a driving licence would be sensible. All very strange. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 4 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said: It's probably worth preserving the sheer oddness of this job ad for posterity: A few random thoughts: If you are wanting domestic help in the Isle of Man, why do you advertise with a London agency? Who on earth is going to apply for a job with that enormous salary range and not think it's suspicious? If it is the Barrowmans why does it say Douglas when it's St Marks? If this is just about looking after the dogs, why specify someone who used to work as a housekeeper rather than is used to looking after dogs? What does 'weekend availability' mean - expected to work seven days a week? Calling 15 month old dogs 'puppies' seems a bit much, though authorities differ. If it is St Marks you'd think specifying a driving licence would be sensible. All very strange. The salary range is bonkers, but do we know it is the Baroness ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbnuts Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 6 minutes ago, Gladys said: The salary range is bonkers, but do we know it is the Baroness ? Well its not me , I'm not gobby , blonde and have any puppies . Unless its those other puppies! she wants looked after.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 6 hours ago, Roxanne said: I wouldn’t. I don’t know anything about her but just know that this job has got danger written all over it. And I bloody love dogs! It certainly sounds like you'll end up a suspect in a Dorothy L. Sayers novel. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlebushy Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 48 minutes ago, Numbnuts said: Bit full of herself also then ! And gobby .. She's just talked herself out of my dating diary 🤣 Those nuts going to remain numb a bit longer then? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 4 hours ago, Gladys said: She should take her dogs to the dog launderette (£7 each) and donate the balance to animal welfare charities. We had Cocker Spaniels when I was a nipper, you couldn't get them into a bath nevermind a tumble dryer! 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbnuts Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 6 minutes ago, littlebushy said: Those nuts going to remain numb a bit longer then? Ahhhh well you'd be wrong . Learnt from a very unhealthy age how to 'take care of myself ' . Mind you extra asistance is always appreciated as getting old now 😉 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbnuts Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Roxanne said: You mean, like, the ‘Jerky’ wank glove Can you buy these in bulk ??? 😉 Covid and all that ! Edited December 5, 2021 by Numbnuts 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 23 minutes ago, Roxanne said: You mean, like, the ‘Jerky’ wank glove I use something like that to groom the animals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 1 minute ago, Gladys said: I use something like that to groom the animals. Is that a euphinism, Glad? 😉 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 Meanwhile Mone's social media shenanigans continue to provide amusement. I particularly like her belief that describing someone as "a waste of a mans [sic] white skin" isn't racist because she didn't realise the target wasn't white. While it's just as racist, whoever it's said to. Though admittedly her lawyers and indeed the Guardian seem to share the delusion. I also particularly enjoyed: The lawyers [...] also questioned the authenticity of the messages, saying Mone had “no access” and no “detailed memory” of them, and they did not appear to be in the language of “a well-educated and articulate Baroness”. To which the only reply is they may not be, but were they the language of Michelle Mone. 1 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbnuts Posted December 5, 2021 Share Posted December 5, 2021 32 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said: Meanwhile Mone's social media shenanigans continue to provide amusement. I particularly like her belief that describing someone as "a waste of a mans [sic] white skin" isn't racist because she didn't realise the target wasn't white. While it's just as racist, whoever it's said to. Though admittedly her lawyers and indeed the Guardian seem to share the delusion. I also particularly enjoyed: The lawyers [...] also questioned the authenticity of the messages, saying Mone had “no access” and no “detailed memory” of them, and they did not appear to be in the language of “a well-educated and articulate Baroness”. To which the only reply is they may not be, but were they the language of Michelle Mone. So the girl can wriggle as well as talk naughty ,, and she should look good in her own brand lingerie I guess mmmmm nah still wouldnt entertain , sorry Michelle have to say a definite no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.