RIchard Britten Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Just now, mojomonkey said: Feed what? I'm just trying to have a discussion. Anyway lunch time is over so back to work for me. You'll be wasting your time with him, but then it is your time to waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted September 26, 2017 Author Share Posted September 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, mojomonkey said: Would I? I've no idea why you continually think I'm a Merkel fan. I'm not particularly a fan and have never voted for her or her party. so you think its fair to ignore the rule of law, the power to act and the disregard of eu treaties? no wonder you love the eu.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edward Boyes Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Dear moyomonkey In Bundesrepublik Deutschland you have a system where it does not matter what party you vote for, you always get a government that rules against the constitution and the people. Just read the first ten articles of the basic law and think whether politicians respect them or not. Remember that the Bundesverfassungsgericht has ruled that ALL elections since 1956 are invalid. Remember that Listenwahl is a violation of the basic law. Remember the refusal of Merkel and of all her predecessors to give the Germans a referendum. Remember the presence of allied nukes on German soil for decades against the will of the people. Remember the participation of governments in aggressive wars against the will of the people. Remember that most laws of Bundesrepublik Deutschland are Nazi laws put in place by Adolf Hitler and still forming the bedrock of the legal system. Remember the involvement of members of the NSDAP in the establishment of Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Globke et al). Remember the incorporation of the GESTAPO and Hitler's criminal lawyers and judges into the administration of Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Remember the lack of a division of powers where the chancellor rules like a dictator because he/ she commands the judiciary and can thus shield herself from all the crimes she and her government commits. The attorneys are all under the command of the ministry of justice which in turn is under the command of the chancellor. The legislative is controlled by the head of the party which in the case of the ruling party is usually also the chancellor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted September 26, 2017 Author Share Posted September 26, 2017 5 minutes ago, mojomonkey said: Feed what? I'm just trying to have a discussion. Anyway lunch time is over so back to work for me. as merkels doormat.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, Edward Boyes said: Dear moyomonkey In Bundesrepublik Deutschland you have a system where it does not matter what party you vote for, you always get a government that rules against the constitution and the people. Just read the first ten articles of the basic law and think whether politicians respect them or not. Remember that the Bundesverfassungsgericht has ruled that ALL elections since 1956 are invalid. Remember that Listenwahl is a violation of the basic law. Remember the refusal of Merkel and of all her predecessors to give the Germans a referendum. Remember the presence of allied nukes on German soil for decades against the will of the people. Remember the participation of governments in aggressive wars against the will of the people. Remember that most laws of Bundesrepublik Deutschland are Nazi laws put in place by Adolf Hitler and still forming the bedrock of the legal system. Remember the involvement of members of the NSDAP in the establishment of Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Globke et al). Remember the incorporation of the GESTAPO and Hitler's criminal lawyers and judges into the administration of Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Remember the lack of a division of powers where the chancellor rules like a dictator because he/ she commands the judiciary and can thus shield herself from all the crimes she and her government commits. The attorneys all all under the command of the ministry of justice which in turn is under the command of the chancellor. The legislative is controlled by the head of the party which in the case of the ruling party is usually also the chancellor. What brought you to write the piece? What brought you to MF to share it with us? What is your dog in this fight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted September 26, 2017 Author Share Posted September 26, 2017 6 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said: You'll be wasting your time with him, but then it is your time to waste. grown ups are talking, moving along..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 It astonishes me that the Germans are still prepared to vote for her. Amazing what brainwashing can do over a few generations to instil a national sense of collective guilt. She hasn't damaged just Germany and her own people with her massive gesture politics folly either. She opened the borders to all and sundry. Not just refugees, but economic migrants and criminals including rapists, murderers and terrorists. She didn't care what other countries on the route to Germany thought about it. Then, when things started getting hot and the liberal idiots waving balloons at the railway stations were replaced by ordinary people baying for her blood, she did a volte-face and put up the shutters leaving all of the countries on the trail to the south stuck with hordes of people who she had encouraged to make the journey, and the people themselves without shelter in countries that don't want them. Stupid, stupid woman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, woolley said: Stupid, stupid woman. Can't be that stupid, she got re-elected after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 I think I covered that, Richard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edward Boyes Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Dear Richard I believe woodley wanted to be kind. There are far better words to describe her. Rather unpleasant or nasty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesultanofsheight Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 8 minutes ago, Edward Boyes said: Dear Richard I believe woodley wanted to be kind. There are far better words to describe her. Rather unpleasant or nasty. Are you related to Roger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted September 26, 2017 Author Share Posted September 26, 2017 46 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said: Can't be that stupid, she got re-elected after all. not yet..... bikinis or burkas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 22 minutes ago, woody2 said: not yet..... bikinis or burkas? Cheese or ham? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Clearly the answer is half rice, half chips. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 6 hours ago, Edward Boyes said: Hello mojomonkey. You can go https://manxeconomics.wordpress.com/ to read the two articles on the Bundestagswahl. Already in 1972 the famous German artist Joseph Beuys created a "Politlithographie" with the title "Uberwindet endlich die Parteiendiktatur!" This was prophetic. More info is on this Youtube channel. Just listen to some of the videos. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBMSkhnAPtL1hhYfJgrWZqg/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0 Ok, watched some of those videos now. I assume you understand German as well, that guy is a bit strange. I'm guessing he is some sort of conspiracy theorist, mixed with a performance artist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.