Jump to content

Liverpool Arms Closes


Non-Believer

Recommended Posts

  • 2 years later...

as i understand it, probably incorrectly, they will only sell it as long as it isn't used as a pub/licensed premises,   if they say it isn't viable as a pub why put that restriction on a sale?  surely they should take the money and run whilst watching it fail and laughing about it

Edited by WTF
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WTF said:

as i understand it, probably incorrectly, they will only sell it as long as it isn't used as a pub/licensed premises,   if they say it isn't viable as a pub why put that restriction on a sale?  surely they should take the money and run whilst watching it fail and laughing about it

I think they (the brewery) know that with the right manager in, that place is a potential gold mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neil Down said:

I think they (the brewery) know that with the right manager in, that place is a potential gold mine.

Indeed...long overdue that this covenant bollox got legally challenged. Force sale at market rates after a year...via big fines for its current state. Another Castle Mona going to rack and ruin and blotting the landscape just because of greed.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Neil Down said:

I think they (the brewery) know that with the right manager in, that place is a potential gold mine.

Shame the brewery can't avail themselves of the goldmine opportunity and install a "right manager" in there then? Or at least a manager who's capable of cleaning the draught pipes more than once a month would do...

Still now they've found out that their profits aren't quite as high as they thought they were, courtesy of an allegedly dodgy auditor, I'm sure they'll be eager to maximise every opportunity to rectify the damage.

Though that'll probably mean just putting the prices up. Again.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WTF said:

as i understand it, probably incorrectly, they will only sell it as long as it isn't used as a pub/licensed premises,   if they say it isn't viable as a pub why put that restriction on a sale?  surely they should take the money and run whilst watching it fail and laughing about it

I think your understanding is correct, and sums up the thread as earlier discussed.

If someone took it on and made it successful I am sure it would attract more people into pubs generally, and might hold up an example to H&B an alternative of how it can be done. Alternatively, as you suggest, the brewery could watch it fail and laugh about it.

At least they should have tried to sell it as a going concern. And if there were no takers them and only then could they put it up for sale with planning permission to residential. I found the reason for the Appeal to be rather inept. "Don't agree with original decision" (ICBA looking, but it was brief words to that effect).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...