Jump to content

Plans for lord street


Blaine

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TheTeapot said:

It's very dodgy.

The developer is Kane Ltd, who no one has ever heard of, and the main man is a guy who seems to run this https://www.businessisleofman.com/ which suggests a fair degree of cosyness.

Does someone have to have heard of it?  It's a 1931 act company that was formed 22 years ago and probably holds other investment assets perhaps.

What's the cosyness you're on about?

It seems that Kane Limited were able to put a deal together (to pre let) and I assume with that an option to buy the site for the development.

Why it's delayed is anyone's guess.  It could have something to do with the pre letting to the cinema? Perhaps the chain is in trouble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Albert Tatlock said:

Not really - our company is one doing precisely what I said.

I agree I heard of one large employer today who has said it won’t be fully back until December. I’d be worried if I worked for a place like that as I think many will be looking for justification for headcount losses. Just giving people rope to hang themselves with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Dog's Dangly Bits said:

Does someone have to have heard of it?  It's a 1931 act company that was formed 22 years ago and probably holds other investment assets perhaps.

What's the cosyness you're on about?

It seems that Kane Limited were able to put a deal together (to pre let) and I assume with that an option to buy the site for the development.

Why it's delayed is anyone's guess.  It could have something to do with the pre letting to the cinema? Perhaps the chain is in trouble. 

Well generally if someone is going to develop a pretty big site you'd expect them to have some kind of evidence of capability to actually carry out such work, no?

The cosyness is that the main guy from the firm also runs a government quango.

So far it seems to be a transfer of a DoI car park to a private company run by someone tightly tied into the government under the 'promise' of future development. At the very least that should raise some questions. Maybe I'm a bit too cynical, but we've seen this kind of shit before.

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheTeapot said:

Well generally if someone is going to develop a pretty big site you'd expect them to have some kind of evidence of capability to actually carry out such work, no?

The cosyness is that the main guy from the firm also runs a government quango.

So far it seems to be a transfer of a DoI car park to a private company run by someone tightly tied into the government under the 'promise' of future development. At the very least that should raise some questions. Maybe I'm a bit too cynical, but we've seen this kind of shit before.

 

Well given he has done development in retail before perhaps he's perfectly capable? 

Also, if he has brought commercial enterprises to the party on pre letting agreements them perhaps he has a good option on the table?

I suspect any transfers are contingent on development so any utilisation of the car park not for development is probably seeing DOI being recompensed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could well be right, I don't really now anything about it, just naturally suspicious is all.

I work in construction, and hear things. There is often a busy rumour mill. Before the Premier Inn was announced it was fairly common knowledge it was going to happen, and even though it was a Dandara project subbies were expecting to pick up work on it. Those kind of noises are absent about this one. It should be a massive job, and if it was going to happen I'd expect some of the people I know to be starting to make space in their diaries to work on it. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Max Power said:

I imagine the Covid-19 lockdown has moved a lot of goalposts for the hotel and cinema chains involved? They will need to regroup before further commitments I imagine?

you may well be correct. No sense in building something meant for crowds if they aren't allowed in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Max Power said:

I imagine the Covid-19 lockdown has moved a lot of goalposts for the hotel and cinema chains involved? They will need to regroup before further commitments I imagine?

The cinema model is at a crossroads anyway.

The fall out of Universal Studios issue could be the beggining of the end for cinemas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Andy Onchan said:

Is that still the position, based on what's now happening (contract parking)?

Yes. The case is for damages, not to have the contract with Kane cancelled.

If anything proceeds slower than IOM building contracts...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John Wright said:

Yes. The case is for damages, not to have the contract with Kane cancelled.

If anything proceeds slower than IOM building contracts...

The point I was trying to get at was, has the delay in the construction been caused by the court case (are Kane implicated?) or the downturn due to CV? It's not entirely clear to me that Kane are out of the picture in regards to the court case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Andy Onchan said:

The point I was trying to get at was, has the delay in the construction been caused by the court case (are Kane implicated?) or the downturn due to CV? It's not entirely clear to me that Kane are out of the picture in regards to the court case.

Kane aren’t involved in the Court case. It’s by the developers who thought they’d got the agreement to develop, but didn’t against the relevant government department. For out of pockets and loss of profits as far as I can tell from what little info is about. Covid might mean a sharp downward figure on losses. So it won’t impact on timetable.

Im presuming the binding contract with Kane provided they take occupation by a certain date, if they didn’t there’d be a break clause. They’ve got planning. They’ve taken occupation. How they stage their building programme is up to them. It’s possible, probable even, that Covid has affected start time. Hence trying for contract parking for a few months.

Does it matter if the hotel is operated as a Travelodge or Hampton by Hilton franchise? We always knew it’d be a franchise operation on lease from the developer.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...