Chinahand Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 I cannot comprehend the mob causing disruption at Alder Hey Hospital demanding a child is kept on a respirator machine which is painfully destroying his lungs in a pointless effort to prolong his life. Liverpudlian Catholic mobs. Erm ... maybe I shouldn't be that surprised at their behaviour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc.fixit Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 ....sorry China, 'their' I think, not there..................so unusual to see such in your meaningful posts.................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 I agree and yes, the poor child should be left in peace. Whoever said that ignorance was bliss was taking the p***. Tragic, but common sense and the view of the medical professionals has to prevail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballaughbiker Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 Thought he was off the ventilator? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted April 25, 2018 Author Share Posted April 25, 2018 10 minutes ago, doc.fixit said: ....sorry China, 'their' I think, not there..................so unusual to see such in your meaningful posts.................. 'faid not, Doc. Far too common in fact, but I've always admitted to such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted April 25, 2018 Author Share Posted April 25, 2018 19 minutes ago, ballaughbiker said: Thought he was off the ventilator? He is, against the demands of the mob outside. My understanding prolonged use of ventilators especially on the young basically shred their lungs - rather than being filled by an under-pressure from the diaphragm or ribs opening up, they have to be filled by an over-pressure to force the air in against the immobile ribs. That overpressure blows away mucus membranes and leaves raw tissue. I can fully understand a compassionate doctor saying keeping your child on such a machine is cruel and the best thing to do is hold him and be with him, but leave the machines alone. Let him be. I cannot comprehend the treat-no-matter-what mentality which would try to put him through such pain needlessly. The catholic church of course claims this is reminiscent of the cross and is something to be welcomed. Sick, is my only response. Sick in the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted April 25, 2018 Author Share Posted April 25, 2018 The New York Times has a thoughtful commentary, orthogonal to the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homarus Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 7 hours ago, ballaughbiker said: Thought he was off the ventilator? Almost 2 days now, they expected him to die in a couple of hours ,it's a fucking disgrace! I think the more serious question is , since when did the state claim ownership of children above the Parents ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 There are religious people that refuse blood transfusions to their kids. It's their religion, not their kids religion. In those cases I'm all for doctors overriding the parents decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballaughbiker Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Quote it's a fucking disgrace! What is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homarus Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 18 minutes ago, ballaughbiker said: What is? The fact that they planned for him to die quite quickly ,but he's hung on for 2.5 days now for one. The fact that the state is claiming ownership of a child and the power of life and death ahead of it's parents for two. A judge saying it's in Alfies best interests to stay on the medical plan devised for him to alleviate suffering ,when the medical plan devised for him is to put him on a planned "Pathway to death" by taking away the treatment that may keep him alive, which is a bit of an oxymoron in my book. The Authorities have made a rod for their own back over this . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevmeister Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Scousers can’t let anything happen in peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballaughbiker Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Quote The fact that they planned for him to die quite quickly ,but he's hung on for 2.5 days now for one. The fact that the state is claiming ownership of a child and the power of life and death ahead of it's parents for two. A judge saying it's in Alfies best interests to stay on the medical plan devised for him to alleviate suffering ,when the medical plan devised for him is to put him on a planned "Pathway to death" by taking away the treatment that may keep him alive, which is a bit of an oxymoron in my book. The Authorities have made a rod for their own back over this . Ok, that's a bit clearer, thanks. Do you agree with Alfie's father that his child's condition has been misdiagnosed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rog Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 In an increasing number of European countries he could / would have been euthanised. Check out The Groningen Convention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.