Jump to content

Rob Callister


La Colombe

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, cissolt said:

£50,000,000 loss for the Mea this year or £580 per head.  Is this the reason for the reshuffle?  Is a £50 million loss considered a success or failure by government?

I would think so. But he still has to provide the answers to Tynwald today, so should be a fun listen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rob Callister’s challenge is to utter as many words as possible to give the impression he is heading up DHSC, whilst being able to achieve nothing and accepting responsibility for nothing. He will be aided in this endeavour by a team of Civil Servants who will give him the words to say in the media and in Tynwald.

A secondary challenge will be to do this whilst having absolutely no expertise in his area of responsibility and having no leadership skills or experience. He will, however be required to be a willing nodding dog for CoMIN. His ego will keep him from accepting the futility of his appointment. 
 

This is Manx politics in 2022. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, cissolt said:

£50,000,000 loss for the Mea this year or £580 per head.  Is this the reason for the reshuffle?  Is a £50 million loss considered a success or failure by government?

Did the Board and the Chair Mr Callister have Tynwald approval for Manx Utilities Authority to absorb the cost of price increases.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, cissolt said:

£50,000,000 loss for the Mea this year or £580 per head.  Is this the reason for the reshuffle?  Is a £50 million loss considered a success or failure by government?

Is it just £50M? He’s just fluffed an answer to Moorhouse at the end of this Tynwald session confirming that to March 2022 the loss was £20M predicted and from April 2022 to Sept 2022 the projected loss is £12M but then suggests that there might be other cash losses that aren’t included in the £50M. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Newsdesk said:

Is it just £50M? He’s just fluffed an answer to Moorhouse at the end of this Tynwald session confirming that to March 2022 the loss was £20M predicted and from April 2022 to Sept 2022 the projected loss is £12M but then suggests that there might be other cash losses that aren’t included in the £50M. 

£75 million was mentioned as the projected loss up to next spring.  The current loan might not even got us through to the end of the year

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

£1,00,000 per week loss as Chair of a Monopoly gets you a promotion- struggling to uncurl my toes @Rob Callister absolutely bewildering levels of incompetence - wow just fucking wow - @Stu Peters this is one of your colleagues any comment @Chris Thomasone of your colleagues any comment @Chris Robertshawno need for Paul Moulton 60 minute videos just put out a statement saying what we all know - baffling and sadly embarrassing for people who actually work to keep their households and lives on track. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr Helmut Fromage said:

£1,00,000 per week loss as Chair of a Monopoly gets you a promotion- struggling to uncurl my toes @Rob Callister absolutely bewildering levels of incompetence - wow just fucking wow - @Stu Peters this is one of your colleagues any comment @Chris Thomasone of your colleagues any comment @Chris Robertshawno need for Paul Moulton 60 minute videos just put out a statement saying what we all know - baffling and sadly embarrassing for people who actually work to keep their households and lives on track. 

Except it isn’t £1m per week. It’s £50 million over 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, John Wright said:

Except it isn’t £1m per week. It’s £50 million over 2 years.

Some would say it was insolvent, if it needs sovereign funds because no institution will support it.

Mind you, how is that Barclays loan against Pulrose going?

Edited by NoTailT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NoTailT said:

It's a mortgage isn't it? One would assume so.... but this is the MUA... can't expedite any transition to renewables with that still on the cards.

No it isn’t a mortgage backed by assets. It’s a loan backed by IOM governments perceived ability to repay at the end of the term.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...