Neil Down Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 33 minutes ago, thesultanofsheight said: I don’t know. I was looking at the CV he posted online at the time of the election. He doesn’t seem to have held down a job for more than 2 years prior to getting in as an MHK. Doesn’t show a lot of ability to plan to be honest waiting until your 50 to get a semi secure job. exactly, he is now on board the gravy train... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesultanofsheight Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 26 minutes ago, Neil Down said: exactly, he is now on board the gravy train... I’m generally not big on applauding people for finally finding the easiest and best paid job they’ve ever had in the public sector. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 36 minutes ago, thesultanofsheight said: I’m generally not big on applauding people for finally finding the easiest and best paid job they’ve ever had in the public sector. Nor am I. The point being he's manoeuvred himself into a nice little earning role 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 8 minutes ago, Grounds Keeper Willy said: That’s like congratulating someone for winning the lottery. plenty of them around too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dog's Dangly Bits Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 Obsessed. A bit creepy even. Should be long before the usual suspects are along now too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rushen Spy Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 4 minutes ago, The Dog's Dangly Bits said: Obsessed. A bit creepy even. Should be long before the usual suspects are along now too. It's quite funny. That you can't see that just shows you have no sense of humour, not unlike a certain Onchan MHK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dog's Dangly Bits Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 Er ok. Sure it does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 1 hour ago, Cheesy Wheezy said: I see Teddy Smith is proposing a great plan to save the post office You mean James Corrin... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Helmut Fromage Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 Whatever happened to "The Faceman" he was very similar to Teddy Smith in his clamour to praise "The People's Prince".... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buncha wankas Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 On 9/25/2019 at 8:03 AM, The Dog's Dangly Bits said: If MHKs had given their expense payment to charity quietly in the past how would you know? Any point you might have about publishing expenses is lost in the bile you're spewing out, that no one wants to read. Rob don’t talk such shite, you just put up near a grand as charity donation, are you daft enough to think lots of politicians have not done more, quietly, and that people in a small community were not in the know of the private contributions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rushen Spy Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 There are a few politicians, actually, who I do not even know personally but I do know privately that they are ethical and morally upstanding people. They don't go around boasting or self-promoting themselves on FaceAche. They have an old-fashioned thing called INTEGRITY: it means that when they do good deeds, they do it for the sake of doing good, and not in order to promote themselves. I could name them and would do so if pushed (as I am not one of them, nor do I have any vested interest in defending or promoting any of them) but I think intelligent or at least morally conscientious people will know what I am saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dog's Dangly Bits Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 28 minutes ago, buncha wankas said: Rob don’t talk such shite, you just put up near a grand as charity donation, are you daft enough to think lots of politicians have not done more, quietly, and that people in a small community were not in the know of the private contributions. Ah, so you don't know any then. Thought so. As for me being Rob - give your heads a wobble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rushen Spy Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 Buncha Wankas is stating a fact that most of us know to be true. It is you who needs to give your head a wobble; or perhaps stop giving your head a wobble every day so your brain can get a bit of blood to it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finlo Posted September 28, 2019 Share Posted September 28, 2019 31 minutes ago, Cheesy Wheezy said: Hilariously this week the master of the 360 social media about turn announces that they aren’t really expenses after all. It was all a dream him publishing a list and claiming that they were expenses last week apparently. What he didn’t realize was how hard making up fictitious expenses actually was despite him doing it for the previous two years and publishing it all like it was all real. Who would have guessed that he didn’t realize that making shit up was so going to lead to people pointing out that you’ve just made shit up? I predict a pay rise! 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dog's Dangly Bits Posted September 28, 2019 Share Posted September 28, 2019 RC not helping himself with the line "I find it hard to justify looking at my pay slip a line entitled member expenses" Well clearly not THAT hard. Otherwise he would simply hand them back. Or certainly the ones he couldn't genuinely justify. Those expenses should be ones incurred doing the job specifically. Hiring halls for surgeries. Fair enough. A portion of mobile phone cost ( you would still have a phone if not an MHK for example). I'm slightly divided on website costs. I suppose you could argue that it falls under communication costs. But again to justify that you would expect the site to be taken down if not elected again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.