Barlow Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 51 minutes ago, Declan said: Carol Singer's what? Her aberrant apostrophe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizo Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 1 hour ago, Ham_N_Eggs said: Why would anyone have £2.85 million in cash just laying around the place? And watches which obviously another bent policman stole. Seems to be a lot of them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Phantom Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 2 hours ago, Declan said: Carol Singer's what? Is she married to Leonard Singer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 2 hours ago, Non-Believer said: To pay his lawyer's fees? 🤭 Who is his lawyer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Helmut Fromage Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 30 minutes ago, Banker said: Who is his lawyer? May I cordially invite you to put down the Daily Mail and read the previous page of this thread ? 2 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 30 minutes ago, Mr Helmut Fromage said: May I cordially invite you to put down the Daily Mail and read the previous page of this thread ? Couldn’t see it mentioned, someone we know?😀 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 29 minutes ago, Banker said: Couldn’t see it mentioned, someone we know?😀 Crass. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Helmut Fromage Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 22 minutes ago, quilp said: Crass. @Banker typical mid level management behaviour prevalent in Comis golf members- I’ll call you Gareth from now on (instead of Bob) as a reference to the Ricky Gervais comedy It’s John Wright the advocate a former admin here and regular contributor to these boards. If you are retired and still fawning over individuals that your boss says don’t upset because because because - it proves your lack of spine a trait seen in many sideways promoted Channel Island banking people who arrived here- fair play for milking it 👊🏻 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 2 minutes ago, Mr Helmut Fromage said: @Banker typical mid level management behaviour prevalent in Comis golf members- I’ll call you Gareth from now on (instead of Bob) as a reference to the Ricky Gervais comedy It’s John Wright the advocate a former admin here and regular contributor to these boards. If you are retired and still fawning over individuals that your boss says don’t upset because because because - it proves your lack of spine a trait seen in many sideways promoted Channel Island banking people who arrived here- fair play for milking it 👊🏻 Thanks Bill, enjoying your backdated government pay rise with another nice holiday over Xmas ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kipper99 Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 Think you’ll find that Mr Wright took no part in the appeal. Mr Bell was represented by Jamás Hodivala KC, instructed by James Quinn. How can anyone know how much “cash” Mr Bell had on a date in 2009, when he wasn’t arrested, or his property searched, until 7 years later. Privy Council beckons. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barlow Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 3 hours ago, Kipper99 said: Think you’ll find that Mr Wright took no part in the appeal. Mr Bell was represented by Jamás Hodivala KC, instructed by James Quinn. How can anyone know how much “cash” Mr Bell had on a date in 2009, when he wasn’t arrested, or his property searched, until 7 years later. Privy Council beckons. Who is James Quinn? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 6 hours ago, The Phantom said: Is she married to Leonard Singer? no, he's ran out of houses. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted December 1, 2023 Share Posted December 1, 2023 13 hours ago, Kipper99 said: Think you’ll find that Mr Wright took no part in the appeal. Mr Bell was represented by Jamás Hodivala KC, instructed by James Quinn. How can anyone know how much “cash” Mr Bell had on a date in 2009, when he wasn’t arrested, or his property searched, until 7 years later. Privy Council beckons. Thanks so Helmut was wrong as usual, no surprise for the civil servant! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted December 1, 2023 Share Posted December 1, 2023 22 hours ago, Kipper99 said: Think you’ll find that Mr Wright took no part in the appeal. Mr Bell was represented by Jamás Hodivala KC, instructed by James Quinn. How can anyone know how much “cash” Mr Bell had on a date in 2009, when he wasn’t arrested, or his property searched, until 7 years later. Privy Council beckons. Yes I wondered if there might be an appeal to the JCPC, it's the sort of technical quibbling that could need to be decided there. And the Government actually lost on the first grounds of appeal and only scaped through on the particular circumstances of the second. Whatever the actual legality, the whole thing looks a bit slapdash. They actually had the Judge of Appeal and two Acting Deemsters to decide (is this the first time they've used Nigel Teare?) so clearly wanting it fairly high powered. But as with this whole case you do wonder what is actually going on. This one could run and run and any actual trial of Bell recede into the distance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passing Time Posted December 1, 2023 Share Posted December 1, 2023 2 hours ago, Roger Mexico said: Yes I wondered if there might be an appeal to the JCPC, it's the sort of technical quibbling that could need to be decided there. And the Government actually lost on the first grounds of appeal and only scaped through on the particular circumstances of the second. Whatever the actual legality, the whole thing looks a bit slapdash. They actually had the Judge of Appeal and two Acting Deemsters to decide (is this the first time they've used Nigel Teare?) so clearly wanting it fairly high powered. But as with this whole case you do wonder what is actually going on. This one could run and run and any actual trial of Bell recede into the distance. The law is an ass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.