mojomonkey Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 6 minutes ago, quilp said: 2. Civil unrest isn't rioting, e.g. the climate activists grinding various cities to a halt in protest. Apropos to which, the High Court has just ruled that Extinction Rebellion's police ban was unlawful: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50316561 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 Just now, quilp said: 1. But thats the type you're referring to. 2. Civil unrest isn't rioting, e.g. the climate activists grinding various cities to a halt in protest. 3. Not advocating riots, or violence, though it'll probably descend into chaos, which I'd find understandable. 4. Er, go fuck yourself... Your words, not mine. "not advocating riots"..."but I can understand if they do"...mixed messages there. 4. The level of "debate" I would expect. Like clockwork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 Yes, like clockwork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 Just now, quilp said: Yes, like clockwork. Noticed a lot more aggressive, sweary posting from you. You okay hun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 Noticed a lot more provocative and incidental trolling from you. R U ok hun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 Whilst this tit for tat name calling responding is funny it isn't really adding anything to the debate. I have no doubt that I've been similarly guilty of it myself at some point but can I suggest (just a suggestion, don't take it as an insult) that people just take some deep breaths and stick to relevant (or at least non-insulting) posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 6 minutes ago, quilp said: Noticed a lot more provocative and incidental trolling from you. R U ok hun? Calling out your slavering devotion to a right wing dog whistle blog is no more trolling than you or Woolster jump on others for using the Guardian as a source. Please try harder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 18 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said: Noticed a lot more aggressive, sweary posting from you. You okay hun? Can't say I've noticed any difference.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 Just now, P.K. said: Can't say I've noticed any difference.... I'm trying to post less, as I don't really have the energy to be dragged into the hate cycle that some posters seem to revel in. I have notice that #Woodybot is running around like a PCP addled ADHD suffering Scrabble letter generator, and Quilp getting directly more aggresive towards other posters. It is occasionally amusing watching others trying to have reasonable conversations, only to fall into the pitfall of trying to engage with certain posters. After a while it just feels a bit tragic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 Another one quits, looks like he is leaving under a shadow https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-politics-50302173 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 5 minutes ago, mojomonkey said: Another one quits, looks like he is leaving under a shadow https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-politics-50302173 They should all leave under a shadow, every single one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 35 minutes ago, mojomonkey said: Apropos to which, the High Court has just ruled that Extinction Rebellion's police ban was unlawful: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50316561 Quote For the reasons set out above in our judgment: (1) the Third, Fourth and Seventh Claimants, but not the First, Second, Fifth and Sixth Claimants, have standing to bring this claim for judicial review; (2) the Third, Fourth and Seventh Claimants should be granted permission to apply for judicial review, but the First, Second, Fifth and Sixth Claimants should be refused such permission; (3) the XRAU was not a public assembly at the scene of which Superintendent McMillan was present on 14 October 2019, so that there was no power to impose a condition under section 14 of the 1986 Act; (4) it is not necessary to decide whether the condition was sufficiently certain as to be lawful; (5) Superintendent McMillan’s decision to impose the condition on 14 October 2019 will be quashed. #loophole Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 18 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said: Quilp getting directly more aggresive towards other posters. No. Just you and Corporal Clott. Anyway, we are all equally to blame when there's a flare-up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 I like the little spats between PK and Quilp, funny stuff always but what is the point of real name man Dick Britten? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted November 6, 2019 Share Posted November 6, 2019 4 minutes ago, TheTeapot said: ...real name man Dick Britten? Player 3 has entered the game... Well, there is a winner for most original poster 2019... Tres amuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.