UK General Election Dec 2019

[manxman1980]

@woolley the person who committed the acts is dead.  What do you want?  Should we try to resurrect him so you can have your gallows moment?

[woolley]

7 hours ago, Barrie Stevens said:

The state can  take life in order to protect the rights and freedoms of others as the Met demonstrated on London Bridge. 

There you go then. If only they had demonstrated it at an earlier stage. 

[woolley]

2 hours ago, manxman1980 said:

@woolley the person who committed the acts is dead.  What do you want?  Should we try to resurrect him so you can have your gallows moment?

Indeed. Agreeably dead, and his condition is now entirely satisfactory. But you don't get away so easily with your above peremptory dismissal of this heinous act. I think that we actually had the modern equivalent of the gallows moment. What a pity that due to the moral cowardice of the liberal system it had to be carried out by brave passers-by and armed police at grave risk to the general public while being  filmed in all of its gore by children on buses. This is a person who had been released early from a sentence for terrorist activity. What were the morons who made the decision thinking? How are they doing with their high ideals? How is their empathy with the slain innocents getting along? What would be their message of enlightenment to the bereaved? How much better if the assailant had been dead 24 hours earlier or at least incarcerated somewhere extremely unpleasant? How much better if those dead innocents were still alive? Perhaps suspend your righteous liberal indignation for a moment and ponder. 

[Barrie Stevens]

10 hours ago, woolley said:

There you go then. If only they had demonstrated it at an earlier stage. 

But not by judicial execution as you well know.

[the stinking enigma]

21 hours ago, woolley said:

Indeed. Agreeably dead, and his condition is now entirely satisfactory. But you don't get away so easily with your above peremptory dismissal of this heinous act. I think that we actually had the modern equivalent of the gallows moment. What a pity that due to the moral cowardice of the liberal system it had to be carried out by brave passers-by and armed police at grave risk to the general public while being  filmed in all of its gore by children on buses. This is a person who had been released early from a sentence for terrorist activity. What were the morons who made the decision thinking? How are they doing with their high ideals? How is their empathy with the slain innocents getting along? What would be their message of enlightenment to the bereaved? How much better if the assailant had been dead 24 hours earlier or at least incarcerated somewhere extremely unpleasant? How much better if those dead innocents were still alive? Perhaps suspend your righteous liberal indignation for a moment and ponder. 

one of the heroes that stopped this guy was a convicted murderer himself. of a disabled girl i was told. not read it anywhere yet though

[Lagman]

40 minutes ago, the stinking enigma said:

one of the heroes that stopped this guy was a convicted murderer himself. of a disabled girl i was told. not read it anywhere yet though

How do you know there is any truth to it then?

was that supposed to be the Polish guy?

 

[quilp]

29 minutes ago, Lagman said:

How do you know there is any truth to it then?

was that supposed to be the Polish guy?

 

Not the Polish guy. The murderer strangled and cut the throat of a woman, 21, who had learning difficulties, in 2004.

[P.K.]

23 hours ago, woolley said:

Indeed. Agreeably dead, and his condition is now entirely satisfactory. But you don't get away so easily with your above peremptory dismissal of this heinous act. I think that we actually had the modern equivalent of the gallows moment. What a pity that due to the moral cowardice of the liberal system it had to be carried out by brave passers-by and armed police at grave risk to the general public while being  filmed in all of its gore by children on buses. This is a person who had been released early from a sentence for terrorist activity. What were the morons who made the decision thinking? How are they doing with their high ideals? How is their empathy with the slain innocents getting along? What would be their message of enlightenment to the bereaved? How much better if the assailant had been dead 24 hours earlier or at least incarcerated somewhere extremely unpleasant? How much better if those dead innocents were still alive? Perhaps suspend your righteous liberal indignation for a moment and ponder. 

It's almost as though the judicial system is run by people and as we all know people fuck up.

Well who would have thought it....?

Clearly not the hang 'em & flog 'em brigade.

Even with the evidence right under their noses they're still in denial...

[woolley]

26 minutes ago, P.K. said:

It's almost as though the judicial system is run by people and as we all know people fuck up.

Well who would have thought it....?

Clearly not the hang 'em & flog 'em brigade.

Even with the evidence right under their noses they're still in denial...

It's under your nose that the current liberal regime is lethal to innocents. A little more opening of your eyes and less burnishing of those lovely high ideals would seem to be in order.  What would you be saying to the bereaved, as a matter of interest?  Presumably you would be telling them what jolly bad luck it was, but never mind because we occupy the moral high ground. What a bankrupt set of values. Let us hope that a popular backlash comes sooner rather than later to sweep these lunatics and their "high ideals" and "empathy"  into the dustbin of history. 

[mojomonkey]

23 minutes ago, woolley said:

It's under your nose that the current liberal regime is lethal to innocents. A little more opening of your eyes and less burnishing of those lovely high ideals would seem to be in order.  What would you be saying to the bereaved, as a matter of interest?  Presumably you would be telling them what jolly bad luck it was, but never mind because we occupy the moral high ground. What a bankrupt set of values. Let us hope that a popular backlash comes sooner rather than later to sweep these lunatics and their "high ideals" and "empathy"  into the dustbin of history. 

If the people who have been in charge since  2010 are liberals who do you suggest replaces them?

[Bobbie Bobster]

40 minutes ago, woolley said:

It's under your nose that the current liberal regime is lethal to innocents. A little more opening of your eyes and less burnishing of those lovely high ideals would seem to be in order.  What would you be saying to the bereaved, as a matter of interest?  Presumably you would be telling them what jolly bad luck it was, but never mind because we occupy the moral high ground. What a bankrupt set of values. Let us hope that a popular backlash comes sooner rather than later to sweep these lunatics and their "high ideals" and "empathy"  into the dustbin of history. 

Planet Woolley sounds like  really horrible place. I'm glad its only an unrealistic fiction.

[woolley]

11 minutes ago, Bobbie Bobster said:

Planet Woolley sounds like  really horrible place. I'm glad its only an unrealistic fiction.

Hello! London Bridge is on Planet Liberal, not Planet Woolley. On Planet Woolley, the killer would have been dead or in jail, and the innocent victims would be alive today. What's not to like?

It's quite amusing that to a man, in their myopic view of the world, all the usual suspects just cannot see the flaw of sacrificing the innocent on the altar of their high ideals.

[woolley]

35 minutes ago, mojomonkey said:

If the people who have been in charge since  2010 are liberals who do you suggest replaces them?

I don't mind who, so long as it is done. Never mind 2010, these crazy values go back to the 1950s for their origins.

[mojomonkey]

2 minutes ago, woolley said:

I don't mind who, so long as it is done. Never mind 2010, these crazy values go back to the 1950s for their origins.

Ok, so who has the values you want? Do any of the parties standing in the election meet your criteria?

[Bobbie Bobster]

6 minutes ago, woolley said:

Hello! London Bridge is on Planet Liberal, not Planet Woolley. On Planet Woolley, the killer would have been dead or in jail, and the innocent victims would be alive today. What's not to like?

It's quite amusing that to a man, in their myopic view of the world, all the usual suspects just cannot see the flaw of sacrificing the innocent on the altar of their high ideals.

“Honestly, the closest I can think of Planet Woolley, as well made as it is, with words and sentences doing the best they can under the circumstances, is theme parks. It isn’t the discussion of human beings trying to convey emotional, psychological experiences to another human being.”