Jump to content

More tourists needed


b4mbi

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, AlanShimmin said:

Not IOM tourists. It might be true in Venice or Barcelona, not Douglas. 

 

15 minutes ago, SleepyJoe said:

Nonsense, the benefits are island wide

Venice and Barcelona suffer from being over touristed. That has an adverse impact on services and facilities for locals.

Tourism has positive and negative impacts on what is available to locals. It’s getting the right market, demographic and facilities to balance.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, John Wright said:

 

Venice and Barcelona suffer from being over touristed. That has an adverse impact on services and facilities for locals.

Tourism has positive and negative impacts on what is available to locals. It’s getting the right market, demographic and facilities to balance.

Good point. What we are not getting is value for money - the endless millions poured into MNH, railways and other guff year after year. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's stop pretending we have anything here that people want to see or experience and divert the time, effort and resources into attracting more people to live here.  

Whatever benefits more tourists bring will be multiplied tenfold by those people living here 365 days a year and contributing to a busier and more economically viable island. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AlanShimmin said:

Good point. What we are not getting is value for money - the endless millions poured into MNH, railways and other guff year after year. 

The suggestion that the expenditure is a justifiable sum as a tourist draw is deceitful, I agree. And, yes, it’s used to try justify expenditure that can’t be justified for the resident population alone.

Id rather we ditched full service on horse trams, steam, electric and mountain railways and swapped the funding to make highly subsidised public transport free for residents.

The Museum & MNH MNT is different. That’s a national, not just a local job. Preserving important Manx culture and history. But things like Peggy and £5 million is too much. It needs to go across to a specialist national museum. We can make do with a replica.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SleepyJoe said:

Tourism allows us a wider ranger of facilities - bars, restaurants, & yes museums - than we would have without it 

Tell the bars bit to Ramsey please 😂

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, John Wright said:

The suggestion that the expenditure is a justifiable sum as a tourist draw is deceitful, I agree. And, yes, it’s used to try justify expenditure that can’t be justified for the resident population alone.

Id rather we ditched full service on horse trams, steam, electric and mountain railways and swapped the funding to make highly subsidised public transport free for residents.

The Museum & MNH MNT is different. That’s a national, not just a local job. Preserving important Manx culture and history. But things like Peggy and £5 million is too much. It needs to go across to a specialist national museum. We can make do with a replica.

Agree with pretty much all of that! 

Any money being spend on 'tourism' should be opened up for bidding. Allow the private sector to pitch ideas for new and inventive attractions. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AlanShimmin said:

Agree with pretty much all of that! 

Any money being spend on 'tourism' should be opened up for bidding. Allow the private sector to pitch ideas for new and inventive attractions. 

 

Agreed. We can't have the responsibility for ideas to drive our tourism strategy resting with the same people who have failed to come up with anything remotely successful for the past decade or so. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John Wright said:

Id rather we ditched full service on horse trams, steam, electric and mountain railways and swapped the funding to make highly subsidised public transport free for residents.

Agreed but the services can still continue if they are operated by interest/volunteer groups. There'd be no shortage of volunteers. Many people pay to go and work on historic transport systems, especially steam (I see no reason why MER wouldn't generate the same enthusiasm).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...