Jump to content

Sir Philip Rutnam quits


thesultanofsheight

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Freggyragh said:

I’m very sceptical about any of these ‘bullying’ allegations. It seems quite the fashion to accuse people of it. Don’t need to look any further than the accusations made against Cregeen. I don’t believe for a minute that either Patel or Bercow are bullies - just a bit vain and demanding to work with. 

I think the stage is set for a very amusing time.

Priti Vacant Patel will probably stay in office because she ticks all the boxes to keep the racists who voted brexit on side and Gove and Johnson completely lack any moral compass whatsoever.

So if Rutman proves his case then they are all going to look completely stupid.

Which is why totally amoral narcissistic serial philanderer and inveterate liar Boris Johnson likes the US model where the judiciary are political appointments.

Yes it's an appalling system if getting to the truth is your objective but when the last thing you want is folks getting to the truth then it's perfect.

Cue Boris Johnson....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, P.K. said:

What report and what effect has it had on Bercow?

Along with other things such as his inappropriate discharging of the role as speaker not to mention his inability to control his awful wife it's keeping the poisonous little reptile out of the Upper House thus breaking a tradition that has stood for around 230 years or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rog said:

Along with other things such as his inappropriate discharging of the role as speaker not to mention his inability to control his awful wife it's keeping the poisonous little reptile out of the Upper House thus breaking a tradition that has stood for around 230 years or so.

His "inappropriate discharging of the role as speaker" is only the opinion of the stupid brexiteers.

Got that Roger? An opinion. That's all.

Looking forward to reading his book. Should be informative....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, P.K. said:

His "inappropriate discharging of the role as speaker" is only the opinion of the stupid brexiteers.

Got that Roger? An opinion. That's all.

Looking forward to reading his book. Should be informative....

No. Mr Speaker has a duty to be impartial above all else.

He absolutely failed in this.

Even his deputy, Dame Eleanor Laing, commented on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rog said:

No. Mr Speaker has a duty to be impartial above all else.

He absolutely failed in this.

Even his deputy, Dame Eleanor Laing, commented on it.

It's his call Roger. It's down to nobody else.

Go suck on it.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, P.K. said:

It's his call Roger. It's down to nobody else.

Go suck on it.....

It's not his call.

The role and responsibilities of Mr Speaker were confirmed and memorialised during the nineteenth century. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rog said:

It's not his call.

The role and responsibilities of Mr Speaker were confirmed and memorialised during the nineteenth century. 

Yes it is his call. He interprets his roles and responsibilities as he sees fit and there's nobody to challenge him.

Is there...

Got that...?

In any event what are you bitching about?

You've got your totally stupid and unnecessary brexit and all that's left is limiting the damage it will cause....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For context:

8 hours ago, Rog said:

Well the poisonous ?little POS isn't in line for the traditional seat in the Upper House and Andrea Leadsom made her opinion very clear that was not contradicted in The House today after PMQ!

I should imagine she wasn't contradicted because the general reaction would have been:

"WTF? He retired months ago...!" or similar...

Like I posted previously - Leadsom is just pathetic....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, at least the peerless Grauniad saw the funny side:

Sacked minister offers self-indulgent resignation speech after more bluster from Boris at PMQs

It’s yet to register with Andrea Leadsom that she was sacked by Boris Johnson in the February reshuffle. In her own mind she stepped down of her own accord despite repeated phone calls begging her to stay on, and no one has as yet been heartless enough to break the bad news to her. Which is how she came to make one of the least self-aware and most self-indulgent resignation speeches ever heard in the Commons.

After a swift jab at the former Speaker – she and John Bercow are united in their mutual loathing of one another – Leadsom settled down to a 15-minute dirge of denial. There were no telling points to be made or scores to be settled. Just a total rewrite of her career to raise it into the realms of mediocrity. It was as if someone who didn’t know her very well had been asked to give the eulogy at her funeral and was struggling to come up with anything memorable.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/mar/04/andrea-leadsom-rewrites-her-history-in-desperate-dirge-of-denial

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sir nige said:

the guardian should of seen the interview with sky before writing nonsense........

Sky don't have a very sharp and amusing political commentator like the Grauniad's John Crace....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, P.K. said:

Sky don't have a very sharp and amusing political commentator like the Grauniad's John Crace....

neither does the guardian.......

they ran this story for weeks yet the guardian didn't spot something......

uk-england-leeds-51386155.thumb.png.7e5cb2444fcdc84d55f832b7fd458540.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...