Jump to content

IOM Covid removing restrictions


Filippo

Recommended Posts

Jersey keeps getting infections in the community. They've just closed a primary school, and one of their firemen has tested positive, so that's his watch off watch. Not a good advert for us to follow.

Guernsey looks as though it is getting cold feet over going into their next phase. The ranks don't seem to be breaking just yet.

"The CCA previously set out a model for the next phase, ‘phase 5c’, which would have seen the introduction of testing on arrival. It would also have meant that arrivals from Group B countries would not be required to self-isolate after receiving a negative result from the test taken on arrival.

However, in recent weeks the prevalence of Covid-19 in all our neighbouring jurisdictions, and notably in the UK regions where the Bailiwick has its main travel links, has risen considerably, and it appears unlikely that this trend will be turned around in the very short term."

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, monasqueen said:

Jersey keeps getting infections in the community. They've just closed a primary school, and one of their firemen has tested positive, so that's his watch off watch. Not a good advert for us to follow.

Guernsey looks as though it is getting cold feet over going into their next phase. The ranks don't seem to be breaking just yet.

"The CCA previously set out a model for the next phase, ‘phase 5c’, which would have seen the introduction of testing on arrival. It would also have meant that arrivals from Group B countries would not be required to self-isolate after receiving a negative result from the test taken on arrival.

However, in recent weeks the prevalence of Covid-19 in all our neighbouring jurisdictions, and notably in the UK regions where the Bailiwick has its main travel links, has risen considerably, and it appears unlikely that this trend will be turned around in the very short term."

Starting the new phases 26th October as per press release , now election over they can get on with economy and keep airlinks going 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Neil Down said:

Sorry, you are going to have to explain that...

If you come from Jersey, Southampton and various other ports you have test day 1 & 7 and if negative you are out of isolation, simple!!

When Jersey get back to 30 in 100k then test day 1 and if negative you are out of isolation.

all starts 26 October 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Banker said:

If you come from Jersey, Southampton and various other ports you have test day 1 & 7 and if negative you are out of isolation, simple!!

When Jersey get back to 30 in 100k then test day 1 and if negative you are out of isolation.

all starts 26 October 

The link says they hope to introduce the regime On 26/10. If cases in France Uk and jersey continue to get worse, it will be shelved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Cambon said:

The link says they hope to introduce the regime On 26/10. If cases in France Uk and jersey continue to get worse, it will be shelved.

Shine on you crazy diamond!

Do they still fly here from Guernsey?

That would put the cat amongst the pigeons once their testing on arrival strategy comes into play.

Dirty infected Guernsey types coming here to golf, walk & spread disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Cambon said:

The link says they hope to introduce the regime On 26/10. If cases in France Uk and jersey continue to get worse, it will be shelved.

Didn't know you were Gavin St Pier !!! The presss release says nothing about shelving?

Good they have a plan and listening to usual dross from Howie & Ashie it's obvious we haven't got one and as usual the tame media still haven't asked why!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, trmpton said:

A false positive.  Like loads of them are.  The difference being in this case that because the first was a private test there was a second one ordered.

Unless I misheard, it wasn't the private one who tested positive that they were talking about (though that's what Howard suggested, but seemed to be corrected by David Ashford straight after).

Perhaps I'm misinterpreting, but it sounded like the negative test was the person who had been in contact with the positive, private case.

 

EDIT: Though Manx Radio is reporting that it was the private positive case who has been tested negative. Guess I did mishear.

Edited by HeliX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...