horatiotheturd Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 7 minutes ago, Declan said: Wouldn’t the Villa Marina have offered ample space to have a waiting room, treatment area and post waiting room. What, you mean a building with disability access, parking, toilets and even refreshment facikitkes, easy access for taxis and that wouldn't need any modification other than a few signs to implement a one way system that the government pwn and manage? Give over, just convert a scabby old shop at great expense instead. BJs conference is interesting. Testing and border restrictions finally being implemented but nowhere near as severe as ours 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lewis Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 This tells you a lot about the mind sets. The DoI's first response is how expensive can we make this and how long can we take to do it. Ashford doesn't need the embarrassment of vaccination centres on a 2 day week so thinks they are doing a great job...for him. What should be the first and foremost consideration of how fast can we get adequate functioning centres up and running so we can increase the vaccination rate for the benefit of the population does not even get a look in. It's too ridiculous to even consider this is what they think they are actually doing. And the one person that can take the two departments and knock heads because its not good enough? Demand the centres are up and running in a week and the vaccination rate is maximised in line with supply? Stop using paperwork as an excuse to use a vaccine that the UK has already used hundreds of thousands of or why an eighty year old is told they have to wait another month for a vaccination !!!! He stands there trying to look important and pretending that everything possible is already being done. Because the alternative is too hard for us and you lot are just not worth the effort. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 3 minutes ago, horatiotheturd said: What, you mean a building with disability access, parking, toilets and even refreshment facikitkes, easy access for taxis and that wouldn't need any modification other than a few signs to implement a one way system that the government pwn and manage? Give over, just convert a scabby old shop at great expense instead. BJs conference is interesting. Testing and border restrictions finally being implemented but nowhere near as severe as ours by converting the shabby old shop they have a reason to hand over funds to somebody in the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 (edited) I wonder if they're getting the timber from DEFA...? Might be a bit of a job waking the saw mill bods up... 4 x 2 and plasterboard sounds like it might be worryingly permanent. Edited January 15, 2021 by Non-Believer extra bit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Helmut Fromage Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 1 hour ago, horatiotheturd said: “Things can only get better.....” 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaymann Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 9 minutes ago, Non-Believer said: I wonder if they're getting the timber from DEFA...? Might be a bit of a job waking the saw mill bods up... 4 x 2 and plasterboard sounds like it might be worryingly permanent. Not sure how Loganair plan to check in 10 flights per day with 3 aircraft this summer.. the construction is kinda in the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Onchan Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 1 minute ago, jaymann said: Not sure how Loganair plan to check in 10 flights per day with 3 aircraft this summer.. the construction is kinda in the way. Don't worry DOI will design and build another airport and put it somewhere.... anywhere. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaymann Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 Just now, Andy Onchan said: Don't worry DOI will design and build another airport and put it somewhere.... anywhere. STOP. Don't give them any ideas. They've been wanting to build a new £120m airport for some time. I can already seeing the case being made and the old airport building become a Southern Hospital. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 31 minutes ago, Lewis said: This tells you a lot about the mind sets. The DoI's first response is how expensive can we make this and how long can we take to do it. Ashford doesn't need the embarrassment of vaccination centres on a 2 day week so thinks they are doing a great job...for him. What should be the first and foremost consideration of how fast can we get adequate functioning centres up and running so we can increase the vaccination rate for the benefit of the population does not even get a look in. It's too ridiculous to even consider this is what they think they are actually doing. And the one person that can take the two departments and knock heads because its not good enough? Demand the centres are up and running in a week and the vaccination rate is maximised in line with supply? Stop using paperwork as an excuse to use a vaccine that the UK has already used hundreds of thousands of or why an eighty year old is told they have to wait another month for a vaccination !!!! He stands there trying to look important and pretending that everything possible is already being done. Because the alternative is too hard for us and you lot are just not worth the effort. The vaccination centre at airport should be ready by now, Jersey hub open 18/01 , Guernsey 25/01 both planning for 1000 per day . IOM vaccination centre ? Plan for ? Per day 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 32 minutes ago, horatiotheturd said: What, you mean a building with disability access, parking, toilets and even refreshment facikitkes, easy access for taxis and that wouldn't need any modification other than a few signs to implement a one way system that the government pwn and manage? Give over, just convert a scabby old shop at great expense instead. That's pretty much it. As for the parking at the Villa, as well as some on site, I believe there's a large multi-story car park very near. What's it called again? But of course the Villa isn't run by DoI (it's DESC) and the DoI will only do things, not for the greater good or government as a whole, but that benefit itself. Rather than ask the DHSC what facilities are needed, they will just produce what suits them and everyone else will have to lump it. Rather like they decided that the Hospital suddenly need lots of security guards when they had the rail staff sitting around doing nothing. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 On the heart attack lady, could I postulate that what has happened is the clinicians have answered the question "does the patient require medical assistance whilst at home?" To which the answer would be "no". Perhaps the question should be "should the patient have support at home to assist?". Would the answer be different? 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaymann Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 5 minutes ago, Gladys said: On the heart attack lady, could I postulate that what has happened is the clinicians have answered the question "does the patient require medical assistance whilst at home?" To which the answer would be "no". Perhaps the question should be "should the patient have support at home to assist?". Would the answer be different? Precisely. It's only a 'clinical decisions' because of a law that politicians introduced. Absolutely not a problem before Christmas. I doubt those asked the questions would be aware of the severity of their answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 3 minutes ago, jaymann said: Precisely. It's only a 'clinical decisions' because of a law that politicians introduced. Absolutely not a problem before Christmas. I doubt those asked the questions would be aware of the severity of their answer. Especially not in Liverpool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barlow Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 Do Ministers not have the power to overturn decisions, even if it is made by professionals? For example, Planning Inspectors decisions have been overturned by the Minister or indeed their depity. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 1 hour ago, horatiotheturd said: What, you mean a building with disability access, parking, toilets and even refreshment facikitkes, easy access for taxis and that wouldn't need any modification other than a few signs to implement a one way system that the government pwn and manage? Give over, just convert a scabby old shop at great expense instead. BJs conference is interesting. Testing and border restrictions finally being implemented but nowhere near as severe as ours “Refreshment facikitkes ” sounds like a Greek dessert. 🥮 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.