Jump to content

IOM Covid removing restrictions


Filippo

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, horatiotheturd said:

The man talks bollocks.  Nowhere else in the world is building purpose built facilities.

What was his experience before being elected to Douglas Council.  

I remember he served me in the Outback once but I assume he has a glittering career beyond being a barman to qualify him for his current position?

He's an accountant apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Numbnuts said:

I read above and first thoughts , 17 days without unexplained cases . My thought would be it implies there have been explained ones . Is it just me being old and thick !?? 

Byron nearly got it right:

Explaining epidemics to the Nation

I wish he would explain his explanation.

What Quayle is using is a special Manx definition for Manx viruses, which will of course behave differently here than anywhere else..  It implies if some superspreader had been swanning around infecting the population in their hundreds yesterday, it wouldn't matter providing we knew where they caught it.  Obviously this is bonkers.

If you use the definition that everyone else on Earth (including the WHO) use, then it's been 11 days since any community (as opposed to managed isolation) cases.  That said we don't know how long those had been isolating before they tested positive (though we do for the seven KWC teenagers the days before) and it might be that circumstances might make the situation safer that it would be on paper.  As ever secrecy meant that it is difficult to judge the decisions made over this latest outbreak.  Which may be the point of it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, the stinking enigma said:

So have the unexplained cases that we had now been explained? 

Henrietta says, "We got lucky with the New Year cluster" in respect of not being in the position that Guernsey is now in. Front page of the Courier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, horatiotheturd said:

I remember he served me in the Outback once but I assume he has a glittering career beyond being a barman to qualify him for his current position?

According to his Tynwald bio:

Retail 1994-2001, bar manager 2001-2003, worked for a local insurance. company 2003-2014, starting as general administrator, then senior administrator and finally as a support specialist. Since 2014 I have worked for a local project firm, acting as operations manager 2014-2015 and Chief Executive 2015-2016.

So not a (qualified) accountant that I can see.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

According to his Tynwald bio:

Retail 1994-2001, bar manager 2001-2003, worked for a local insurance. company 2003-2014, starting as general administrator, then senior administrator and finally as a support specialist. Since 2014 I have worked for a local project firm, acting as operations manager 2014-2015 and Chief Executive 2015-2016.

So not a (qualified) accountant that I can see.

Somebody on these boards a short while back posted that he was a "project manager"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Non-Believer said:

Henrietta says, "We got lucky with the New Year cluster" in respect of not being in the position that Guernsey is now in. Front page of the Courier.

That is the most accurate thing any of them has said. We’re where we are by luck, not design

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, yorik said:

That is the most accurate thing any of them has said. We’re where we are by luck, not design

Yet tweedle dee and tweedle dum would have you believe they are the saviours of the IOM

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're all sat here behind your keyboards judging someone who you probably don't know, doing something they would have never expected to be facing. David was an exceptionally clever, astute person at school and as far as I am concerned is handling things very well. 

Before anyone asks, no I don't know him personally, he's not my MHK, I'm just saying what I see. He's honest and appears to care.

Looking back over the years we could be in a much worse situation. 

Edited by Capt_Mainwaring
Typo
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, horatiotheturd said:

If they explained the unexplained cases then they would all be explained and there would have never been eny unexplained cases so then they would have to explain why we went into an unexplained lockdown when in fact all cases could be explained and none were  unexplained.

Then Howard, the CM that noone can explaine, would have to explaine to the rest of the unexplicably elected Council of ministers why the unexplained couldn't have been explained more quickly.

Then Paul Moulton would ask for an explanation at a press briefing, and well, you can imagine the rest.  I don't think I need to explain it.

You are great. And right. They are a bunch of clowns...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...