Jump to content

IOM Covid removing restrictions


Filippo

Recommended Posts

Just now, Andy Onchan said:

I'm not ignorant. Biology will determine how much is passed on.

Vaccination is not designed to allow organisations to do stupid things like not following advice and guidance. The SPCo should be operated in a COVID safe way. If you think vaccinating all of the staff would allow them to not work in a safe way and get away with it then you are wrong.

If you are vaccinated and come into contact with the virus it will be in you and on you and you could pass it on for a short period. Your immune system would see it and set to work on it and (hopefully) stop you being ill. In that short time there is a risk you could pass it on. Therefore vaccinating the SPC staff;

1) Would not work

2) Would deprive a vulnerable person from getting vaccinated.

You don't need to be an expert on disease control or immunology to understand this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Happier diner said:

Vaccination is not designed to allow organisations to do stupid things like not following advice and guidance. The SPCo should be operated in a COVID safe way. If you think vaccinating all of the staff would allow them to not work in a safe way and get away with it then you are wrong.

If you are vaccinated and come into contact with the virus it will be in you and on you and you could pass it on for a short period. Your immune system would see it and set to work on it and (hopefully) stop you being ill. In that short time there is a risk you could pass it on. Therefore vaccinating the SPC staff;

1) Would not work

2) Would deprive a vulnerable person from getting vaccinated.

You don't need to be an expert on disease control or immunology to understand this.

It's a couple of hundred people when we are vaccinating about 800 a day.  I'm not sure it massively impacts on "the vunerable".  Not forgetting a decent portion of the vulnerable have been vaccinated already. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Happier diner said:

Vaccination is not designed to allow organisations to do stupid things like not following advice and guidance. The SPCo should be operated in a COVID safe way. If you think vaccinating all of the staff would allow them to not work in a safe way and get away with it then you are wrong.

If you are vaccinated and come into contact with the virus it will be in you and on you and you could pass it on for a short period. Your immune system would see it and set to work on it and (hopefully) stop you being ill. In that short time there is a risk you could pass it on. Therefore vaccinating the SPC staff;

1) Would not work

2) Would deprive a vulnerable person from getting vaccinated.

You don't need to be an expert on disease control or immunology to understand this.

It's called risk mitigation. Otherwise why would we be bothering with vaccinations at all?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

I was about to explain yet again how genomics and tracing (there's no tracking apps being used here) interact and reinforce each other.  But you're right, they would take no more notice than they did the previous times.

Thats because they know that it wouldn't help because that's their job. The sequencing will be done, but for different reasons. If HRH DrG can get sequence tests before people get a positive test (i.e magic) then it would be very useful (incredibly useful). The sad truth is that she can't. She might be able to get a result a bit quicker (say 3 days rather then 5) but sadly that's no help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Andy Onchan said:

It's called risk mitigation. Otherwise why would we be bothering with vaccinations at all?

Vaccination is to stop you dying.

Controlling spread of the disease by observing a strict protocol and not allowing employees who have recently been in contact with persons who are likely to be infected mixing in our community and getting their hair done in Onchan is what companies should do to stop outbreaks. That is what risk mitigation is. You deal with the thing that is most likely and implement mitigations that have the greatest effect.

What you are saying is that we should encase all drivers in rubber, we don't. We have driving laws to stop accidents happening. Vaccinations are more akin to an airbag. A contingency and not a mitigation.

There are many good books on Risk Assessment.

Edited by Happier diner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Happier diner said:

Thats because they know that it wouldn't help because that's their job. The sequencing will be done, but for different reasons. If HRH DrG can get sequence tests before people get a positive test (i.e magic) then it would be very useful (incredibly useful). The sad truth is that she can't. She might be able to get a result a bit quicker (say 3 days rather then 5) but sadly that's no help.

Thought she could turn the results around in 24 hours.  In any case you would focus the genomics on those tests done in the tracing process so, presumably, don't need to wait for the positive test. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...