wrighty Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 2 minutes ago, Peter Layman said: Good to see that the Java staff tested negative and are now back at work. I am slightly confused at this though. My colleague at work is currently self isolating at home after his young daughter was caught up in the school isolation bit. Daughter had the test which came back negative. However, the family still have to stay in isolation until they have a second test. Why does that not apply to Java staff? Because we don't know the exact timings, level of contact etc. I would suggest however, that young daughter to parent contact/transmission is far more likely than customer to kitchen staff transmission, which may explain the apparent discrepancy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two-lane Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 16 hours ago, Banker said: Several relatives have had similar experience which is not great if you’re elderly and easily confused ,one was promised call back as vaccinations line kept ringing out but it never happened Just wait until they get an email.... After I registered I got an email asking me to fill in consent forms. In the email the words "Consent Form" were highlighted as though is was a URL link. Clicking on it does nothing - because no URL link has been included. Further down there are what appears to be two URLs concatenated on the same line. Clicking somewhere does go to a link, but not to consent forms. But, somewhat to my surprise, I found that the final few characters of the second URL are actually a link to a third, hidden, URL - which is where the consent form is. How many oldies are willing to wade through the source text of an email to find this stuff out? - apart from me, of course. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Peter Layman said: Good to see that the Java staff tested negative and are now back at work. I am slightly confused at this though. My colleague at work is currently self isolating at home after his young daughter was caught up in the school isolation bit. Daughter had the test which came back negative. However, the family still have to stay in isolation until they have a second test. Why does that not apply to Java staff? Not all of the staff were high risk contacts...so can work after a single test....which is what Ashford said on MR this morning. Edited February 23, 2021 by Albert Tatlock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Layman Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 Just now, Albert Tatlock said: Not all of the staff were high risk contacts...so can work after a single test. Thanks, Wrighty also explained what could be the reasoning behind it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Onchan Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 (edited) What level are we on, in the Borders Framework? Level 4 is highlighted in green. Is that the current level that's in operation? I thought we were in Level 5A. I don't recall seeing a press release about a change. ETA: Indeed it does say we're in Level 4. Edited February 23, 2021 by Andy Onchan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 Howard the Great to address the nation later today. I for one will be absolutely steaming by then. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryFuchwit Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 4 minutes ago, Roxanne said: That is very true. But she then went on and became a doctor. A real one, and an expert it genomic testing We have a health Minister who says all the words but is still coming from the experience of a barman. And paper clips. If this was a level playing field, who would you like to hear calling the shots. David or Rachel? Daddy or chips, daddy or chips. Yes but DA is being advised by people with real qualifications too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryFuchwit Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 36 minutes ago, Peter Layman said: from what I have seen so far, will the response start off with some abuse... Lol. It's almost like you are new here. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Git Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 4 minutes ago, Roxanne said: That is very true. But she then went on and became a doctor. A real one, and an expert it genomic testing We have a health Minister who says all the words but is still coming from the experience of a barman. And paper clips. If this was a level playing field, who would you like to hear calling the shots. David or Rachel? Daddy or chips, daddy or chips. I wasn’t knocking her, just thinking that previous bar work isn’t necessarily a deterrent to progressing. I’m a big fan of Dr Glover, but think she maybe needs to reign it in a little on social media re the government. I think they’ve lost control of this current “cluster”. Have four restaurant bookings before the weekend and expect half to be cancelled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AcousticallyChallenged Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 Oooh, we get HQ gracing our screens at 4pm. 4pm means no bad news usually too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 4 minutes ago, AcousticallyChallenged said: Oooh, we get HQ gracing our screens at 4pm. 4pm means no bad news usually too. Billed as general update!! He’s also confirmed in HOK that SPC will be vaccinated hopefully this week & subject to regular testing which presumably they haven’t been so far Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryFuchwit Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 10 minutes ago, Roxanne said: I choose neither. I choose being led by someone who knows what they are doing and who has staff to project manage the whole scenario plugging loopholes before they become a danger. Preferably around March 2020. Definitely need to move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 Have contact tracing linked back any of these cases to the 2008 cronk y voddy sports day yet? It was jam packed, remember thinking that at the time as i stood on the podium to huge applause 1 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AcousticallyChallenged Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 1 minute ago, TerryFuchwit said: Definitely need to move on. Those are probably your favourite words. How many times have they worked here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 If Dr Glover was Dr Richard Glover Terry Fuckwit would not be saying that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.