Jump to content

IOM Covid removing restrictions


Filippo

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, AlanShimmin said:

Stop looking at graphs and models. 

Look at real life examples. When Israel opened up they had fewer people fully vaccinated than the UK currently has. 

Israel had a tiny increase in cases and virtually no increase in hospitalizations or deaths. 

Denmark. Sweden. America. 
 

God forbid even Jersey, people aren’t dropping dead left right and centre.

We need decent leadership now.  If anything the UK delaying is a last chance for our useless shower to bite the bullet and put the island on the map as somewhere people from the UK can visit and have a proper break without masks and distancing.

It is a last time offer, and they won’t take it

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Dog's Dangly Bits said:

Why?

Clearly in a month there will be a new variant.  They will still obsessively be reporting covid cases.

We are at the stage now where the government has backed themselves into a corner which is where they will remain.  Bottling decisions.

Scary stuff really.

BUT WHY???

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Dog's Dangly Bits said:

I cant help you if you're going to be silly.

I've told you why it'll be extended again.  Boris and Co in massive hole.  Bottling it.

You make stupid statements as if theyre fact and can't explain them. Show your working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheTeapot said:

You make stupid statements as if theyre fact and can't explain them. Show your working.

It isn't stupid at all.

The problem is the obsession with case numbers.  Those numbers are not disappearing.   In a month what happens?  

So in the meantime you have more livelihoods ruined, more fall out for those people mentally (be that business owners or employees).   

You also have the issue of devolved responsibility.   Government don't really want to take responsibility.   So they devolve it to someone else.  In the IOMs case that is now the EAG.  The EAG won't want to take responsibility.   So they'll give the government the get out they need by bottling decisions to get back to normal.

I think what is even more concerning is that normal rational people are now conditioned into thinking there is some unpalatable risk, where there really isn't.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, The Dog's Dangly Bits said:

It isn't stupid at all.

The problem is the obsession with case numbers.  Those numbers are not disappearing.   In a month what happens?  

So in the meantime you have more livelihoods ruined, more fall out for those people mentally (be that business owners or employees).   

You also have the issue of devolved responsibility.   Government don't really want to take responsibility.   So they devolve it to someone else.  In the IOMs case that is now the EAG.  The EAG won't want to take responsibility.   So they'll give the government the get out they need by bottling decisions to get back to normal.

I think what is even more concerning is that normal rational people are now conditioned into thinking there is some unpalatable risk, where there really isn't.

Your last paragraph is BINGO.

Game, set & match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...