Nom de plume Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 7 minutes ago, Zarley said: Why do you read this thread if it triggers you so much? ❄ Triggered, no. Pitying, yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramseyboi Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 Wasn’t there a protest scheduled for outside tynwald tomorrow? Scaredy-cat’s 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbnuts Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 (edited) JW saying some of tynwald havent been double jabbed. How can that be ? What ages are we up too now ? Edited July 19, 2021 by Numbnuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 Just now, Numbnuts said: JE saying some of tynwald havent been double jabbed. How can that be ? What ages are we up too now ? They are using mental age......15 3 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrighty Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 38 minutes ago, Annoymouse said: Exactly the same today : 893 - 698 = 195. This really is quite embarrassing in my view. I wonder if the websites that collect worldwide data harvest these figures and end up with things like negative percentages recovering in the past 24 hours etc. How difficult can it be to have a single spreadsheet column containing ‘new positives’ since the previous snapshot, and having active cases being the sum of the last 14 cells, and daily change being a simple 2 cell subtraction? 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanShimmin Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 It's not about case numbers. But the government's inability to present them in a way that makes sense. If they can't add up what else are they incapable of? 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 They've been playing these games all along. Youvegotanicesmilegate revolved around the same thing. Hetty was a bit pissed off because moulton ruined her peak, so to speak 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Phantom Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 It's club (Covid) 18-30 more or less. Unvaxxed party people. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 He brought it forward a couple of days, so it didnt actually tie ìn with the measures of mitigation taken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanShimmin Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 10 minutes ago, wrighty said: This really is quite embarrassing in my view. I wonder if the websites that collect worldwide data harvest these figures and end up with things like negative percentages recovering in the past 24 hours etc. How difficult can it be to have a single spreadsheet column containing ‘new positives’ since the previous snapshot, and having active cases being the sum of the last 14 cells, and daily change being a simple 2 cell subtraction? Same as collating numbers for those who would be in isolation. Ashy claimed it would be difficult to keep track as people left iso 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 Its quite cowardly really, thinking about it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 "You've got to learn to live with the virus" says the 'leadership', cowering away. What a hilarious bunch of absolute fucking pussies. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 13 minutes ago, Ramseyboi said: Completely different testing regime in Malta and they probably identify less cases. Well Malta is testing many more people and their positivity rate is 3.8%. We had 238 positives out of 802 tests, which is 29.6%. Quite possibly a world record. So they will be identifying more of the cases they have because they must be more generous with their testing criteria. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 12 minutes ago, AlanShimmin said: It's not about case numbers. But the government's inability to present them in a way that makes sense. If they can't add up what else are they incapable of? Everything! Running a piss up in a Manx Brewey Major Infrastructure Projects I could go on with many more examples of areas which IOMG are totally incapable and incompetent off. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheldon Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 18 minutes ago, wrighty said: This really is quite embarrassing in my view. I wonder if the websites that collect worldwide data harvest these figures and end up with things like negative percentages recovering in the past 24 hours etc. How difficult can it be to have a single spreadsheet column containing ‘new positives’ since the previous snapshot, and having active cases being the sum of the last 14 cells, and daily change being a simple 2 cell subtraction? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.