Banker Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 1 minute ago, forestboy said: What are they hoping to achieve other than many ££££££ wasted on the inquiry itself? Demand from public apparently same as UK, will cost£m & by the time we get results everyone will forgotten it happened. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steady Eddie Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 2 minutes ago, Banker said: Demand from public apparently same as UK, will cost£m & by the time we get results everyone will forgotten it happened. It’s well worth the cost here to get an independent audit on everything. The number of imprisonments alone needs to be thoroughly investigated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forestboy Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Steady Eddie said: It’s well worth the cost here to get an independent audit on everything. The number of imprisonments alone needs to be thoroughly investigated. It’s a complete waste of money and any report will just be shelved. The imprisonments were all within the provisions of enacted legislation. Edited October 29, 2022 by forestboy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steady Eddie Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 Just now, forestboy said: The imprisonments were all within the provisions of enacted legislation. Which were a hang over from 1939 and emergency WW2 powers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forestboy Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 13 minutes ago, Steady Eddie said: Which were a hang over from 1939 and emergency WW2 powers. So what? The judiciary must have been happy with the provisions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steady Eddie Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 2 minutes ago, forestboy said: So what? The judiciary must have been happy with the provisions. Yes because enacting 70 plus year old emergency legislation that hadn’t been reviewed since the end of WW2 was always going to end well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0bserver Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 3 minutes ago, Steady Eddie said: Yes because enacting 70 plus year old emergency legislation that hadn’t been reviewed since the end of WW2 was always going to end well. At least we're now in the fortunate position that Tynwald has completely redrawn all of that emergency legislation in depth, based on independent expert legal advice to make sure that the same thing isn't repeated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 25 minutes ago, forestboy said: The imprisonments were all within the provisions of enacted legislation. They weren't, there's currently at least one court case regarding compensation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeliX Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 The inquiry will be a lovely little earner for a few and amount to absolutely fuck all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 47 minutes ago, HeliX said: The inquiry will be a lovely little earner for a few and amount to absolutely fuck all. Sounds like most Government departments to be fair. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quaylaM Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 On 10/27/2022 at 10:50 PM, HeliX said: Covid causes organ damage in some of those infected. Sitting around for a year in your house instead of getting your regular amount of exercise (via work or otherwise) is bad for your heart. Billions of vaccines administered, a relatively small number of noteworthy adverse events. This is not true. I see today that Dr Peter McCullough - hugely respected, at least until he started questioning the covid 'narrative' - in the last few days was relaying (I don't know the origin of his figures) that prior to covid vaccinations myocarditis appeared in 4 in a million and is now running at 25,000 per million Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anyone Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 6 minutes ago, quaylaM said: This is not true. I see today that Dr Peter McCullough - hugely respected, at least until he started questioning the covid 'narrative' - in the last few days was relaying (I don't know the origin of his figures) that prior to covid vaccinations myocarditis appeared in 4 in a million and is now running at 25,000 per million In the meantime Covid boosters continue apace , killing no one. And Covid is now just a nasty cold thing. So you might just be kinda wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 7 minutes ago, quaylaM said: This is not true. I see today that Dr Peter McCullough - hugely respected, at least until he started questioning the covid 'narrative' - in the last few days was relaying (I don't know the origin of his figures) that prior to covid vaccinations myocarditis appeared in 4 in a million and is now running at 25,000 per million Exactly 25,000 per million ? https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj-2021-069445#:~:text=Myocarditis after dose two&text=For 18-39 year old,per million (low certainty). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quaylaM Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anyone Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 I’ll give that a miss. Time I’ll never get back. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.