Jump to content

IOM Covid removing restrictions


Filippo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Annoymouse said:

I wasn’t aware until recently that whilst people returning to the island are required to isolate, those that live in the same household, ie the very people who picked the returnee up from the airport/sea terminal and are spending a great deal of time with that person, are not required to isolate. Ticking time bomb right there IMO.

The returnee has to isolate as far as possible from other members of the household, stay in a separate room, have their own bathroom or throughly clean after use, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gladys said:

The returnee has to isolate as far as possible from other members of the household, stay in a separate room, have their own bathroom or throughly clean after use, etc. 

That’s only guidance and is reliant on people actually thinking about others and the possible outcomes. It doesn’t actually work, it was his missus returning from the UK and he was all to happy to spend some prolonged exposure with her and then tell everyone else about it. Eating cooked meals together, sleeping in the same bed and watching TV together, we only complained as we feel he should also isolate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard or read somewhere that transmission within the home of those isolating was relatively low (possibly last week's govt briefing).   That may be because the majority follow the guidance, or because those isolating don't have the virus.  If that person had a positive test, then those actions are irresponsible.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ITV news this morning reporting that Houses of Commons will not have to adhere to 10pm curfew. Presumably the same applies to all the 'private' gentlemen clubs in London as well. 

The Care Minister (tries to) explains the science behind the curfew in that people who spend more time in social cal drinking places tend to comply less with social distancing measures so thats why they are curbing the drinking times.

As the problems in Manchester continue can't help but wonder how many students and parents wished they had stayed at home, if they had been told what was probably going to happen. The hypocrisy just keeps on rolling.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gladys said:

I heard or read somewhere that transmission within the home of those isolating was relatively low (possibly last week's govt briefing).   That may be because the majority follow the guidance, or because those isolating don't have the virus.  If that person had a positive test, then those actions are irresponsible.  

That’s because the vast majority going to UK are careful and the situation is not as bad as the media portray it except amongst the younger generation.

no one follows the separate isolation at home 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gladys said:

I heard or read somewhere that transmission within the home of those isolating was relatively low (possibly last week's govt briefing).   That may be because the majority follow the guidance, or because those isolating don't have the virus.  If that person had a positive test, then those actions are irresponsible.  

Refusing to self-isolate when told to is now illegal in England from Monday, with fines of up to £10,000.

Anyone who tests positive for Covid-19, or has been told they have been in contact with someone who has, now has a legal duty to quarantine.

It comes as a study commissioned by the government found just 18% of people who had symptoms went into isolation.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54320482

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, The Old Git said:

I know someone currently doing it very carefully and conscientiously, so you’re obviously wrong. 

In general, no one I know had had children eat separate in own rooms and some only have one bathroom and are not going to clean after each use .

one near neigbour had girlfriend sitting at edge of garden with his children running between the two of them and then going to school 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we just tested on arrival with an agreed isolation period depending on travel history then we wouldn’t need the snitching to catch people or the other stupid restrictions.

Isle of Man have had 340 positive cases from 12400 tests, Jersey have had 400 from 113,000 so a % basis our positive cases are a lot higher. Also 3 months after opening borders they have had no serious cases requiring hospitalization 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, P.K. said:

As Covid cases rise, an increasingly heated debate has emerged over whether to readopt stringent measures or return to ‘the business of living’

The issue is about choice. All the analysis and modelling and science etc needs to be aired in public and let everyone choose the decisions they have to make for themselves. Too many decisions being made behind closed doors and then skulking away and staying quiet when it gets a bit contraversial. Hmmmm.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, P.K. said:

Lockdowners v libertarians: Britain’s coronavirus divide

As Covid cases rise, an increasingly heated debate has emerged over whether to readopt stringent measures or return to ‘the business of living’

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/27/lockdowners-v-libertarians-britain-coronavirus-divide

Just like Manx Forums split!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...