trmpton Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 Bit much to assume a breach of some sort to be honest. As I understand it, if my wife was returning I could legally and fully within guidance for and get her from airport in our car, then return home and she isolate? She could get a taxi? Also seems stupid for a blanket “while household” rule. A 1000sq ft hone with four people in it is a slightly different proposition to a 5000 ft home with two occupants Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 7 minutes ago, Declan said: But that was always a foreseeable situation. They accepted the risk up to now, so there must be another reason for change. They thought it wouldn't happen. A lot of people on MF and elsewhere pointed out that it would almost certainly happen. It happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 Ashie looks a bit wasted, he should grow a moustache Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asitis Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 25 minutes ago, TheTeapot said: Ashie looks a bit wasted, he should grow a moustache Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 30 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said: They thought it wouldn't happen. A lot of people on MF and elsewhere pointed out that it would almost certainly happen. It happened. I wonder if the good Dr. Glover will proffer an opinion on this new state of affairs....? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 35 minutes ago, trmpton said: As I understand it, if my wife was returning I could legally and fully within guidance for and get her from airport in our car, then return home and she isolate? My mate caught stuff from his wife after she'd been away...got a divorce. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTail Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 Calm down. We don't have bodies on the streets, hospital in total overload etc. 2 people have tested positive. If the tracing people are good there should be no problem 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 1 hour ago, Kopek said: If we take the above scenario as gospel, Husband to Wife to Sister? The sisters transmission would be unforeseen, innocent if the 'Wfe' did not know that she was infected. A person (husband) isolating is required to separate from the household. If he passed it to his wife, then a breech? But you are only required to isolate as far as practicable. We were told it is quite a low risk of transmission but it has happened. It doesn't necessarily mean they ignored isolation. Let's not bay for more blood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barlow Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 1 hour ago, TheTeapot said: Kopek wants blood He's just asking if there has been a breach. Clearly there has. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 I would rather see what is done about the trawler owner who "chartered" his boat to the fugitive up in court today. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barlow Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Gladys said: But you are only required to isolate as far as practicable. We were told it is quite a low risk of transmission but it has happened. It doesn't necessarily mean they ignored isolation. Let's not bay for more blood. It's like asking German bikers if they wouldn't mind awfully keeping to the left hand side of the road when they ride on our roads. Bitte. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 Stupid fools. They have caused panic. Now all the students will be back in the next 7 days causing an even bigger issue. Unbelievable. If the Gov in forcing this rule on its citizens and residents it should pay the whole cost of alternative accommodation for returning students Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cambon Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 1 hour ago, Declan said: But that was always a foreseeable situation. They accepted the risk up to now, so there must be another reason for change. Uk having gone from circa 1000 new cases a day to over 33000 today, is a good enough reason. They have not declared how many dead yet, but yesterday was 595 comp area to figures sometimes in the teens a few weeks ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 30 minutes ago, Roxanne said: Is it because someone arrived back from the UK with the virus and transmitted it to one of the household where they were isolating? As we've said many times would happen? I've never quite seen the sense in one person in a house self-isolating alongside others who don't. I guess now it's going to be a bit more watertight. I didn't listen to the queen's broadcast this affy. I got the news this morning from the EVF garage in Laxey that there were two community cases. Apparently it might have been discussed on the Facebook? The EDF garage probably had a better delivery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulJ Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, Gladys said: The EDF garage probably had a better delivery. with more integrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.