Spat between Chief Minister and Dr Glover

[The Old Git]

6 hours ago, Banker said:

2 sides to the story says Howard!

Seems to be two sides to his own story - I’ve met her / I’ve never met her. 
 

ETA Also the DHSC. She wasn’t an employee. It’s our code because she wrote it while an employee. 

Edited April 7, 2021 by The Old Git

[Gladys]

Well, thinking about this, the answer to the theft, or not, of the IP will be revealed by analysis of the coding.  Ironically, a bit like genomics. 

[The Voice of Reason]

23 hours ago, quilp said:

 

I’ve reminded you before, we live in a supposed 'democracy' where free-speech is a given, that's what posters on here are doing, exercising that right.

I’d just rather you exercised that right with a little less aggression and a bit more tolerance for those with a different view.

[The Voice of Reason]

7 hours ago, Non-Believer said:

Didn't Ashford say that during the Moulton interview too? Maybe they've been provided with the same script?

Or maybe they were both saying what everyone is thinking

[MasterRace]

8 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said:

I’d just rather you exercised that right with a little less aggression and a bit more tolerance for those with a different view.

He can’t he’s a sad angry cunt with a staggering superiority complex when it comes to the unbelievable and embarrassing shit he posts on this forum. 

[Non-Believer]

11 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said:

Or maybe they were both saying what everyone is thinking

I doubt very much that it is "everyone"....certainly not outside Cabinet Office anyway.

[Augustus]

9 minutes ago, MasterRace said:

He can’t he’s a sad angry cunt with a staggering superiority complex when it comes to the unbelievable and embarrassing shit he posts on this forum. 

So that's the one post you've come on here to make, Heinrich? Or is it Reinhard? I get you Nazis confused.

[piebaps]

57 minutes ago, Gladys said:

Well, thinking about this, the answer to the theft, or not, of the IP will be revealed by analysis of the coding.  Ironically, a bit like genomics. 

Yes but as you know, the use of genomics won't change the response

[Uhtred]

8 hours ago, Pipsqueak said:

it appears they may have been    

I recognise that handwriting... Harmer!

[Annoymouse]

Did T.V.O.R get a temp ban or something? Where has this MasterArse come from?

[MasterRace]

58 minutes ago, Annoymouse said:

Did T.V.O.R get a temp ban or something? Where has this MasterArse come from?

I’m sure most posters who challenge the mighty intellect 😂 of posters like Quilp et all probably get a ban. I was just looking at the other thread where so many posters questioning the repetitive COVID hysterics seem to have just disappeared from posting. Imagine being that thick and useless that instead of putting up a coherent argument to counter posts you don’t like you just act like a total knob and get the mods to suspend the accounts of the people showing you up? And that’s when you’re already using about four different accounts to filter your feeble arguments through. As T.V.O.R said it’s pitiful really and so thoroughly despotic and grandiose. You say you believe in free speech but only if other people say things you agree with. If not, as seen with T.V.O.R, you act like a rampaging despotic nut job.

Edited April 7, 2021 by MasterRace

[Gladys]

56 minutes ago, MasterRace said:

I’m sure most posters who challenge the mighty intellect 😂 of posters like Quilp et all probably get a ban. I was just looking at the other thread where so many posters questioning the repetitive COVID hysterics seem to have just disappeared from posting. Imagine being that thick and useless that instead of putting up a coherent argument to counter posts you don’t like you just act like a total knob and get the mods to suspend the accounts of the people showing you up? And that’s when you’re already using about four different accounts to filter your feeble arguments through. As T.V.O.R said it’s pitiful really and so thoroughly despotic and grandiose. You say you believe in free speech but only if other people say things you agree with. If not, as seen with T.V.O.R, you act like a rampaging despotic nut job.

I suggest you check the meaning of coherent, hysterical and despotic. 

[MasterRace]

2 minutes ago, Gladys said:

I suggest you check the meaning of coherent, hysterical and despotic. 

I have a dictionary. 

[Gladys]

1 minute ago, MasterRace said:

I have a dictionary. 

Great, that's  step number one. 

[Annoymouse]

1 hour ago, MasterRace said:

I’m sure most posters who challenge the mighty intellect 😂 of posters like Quilp et all probably get a ban. I was just looking at the other thread where so many posters questioning the repetitive COVID hysterics seem to have just disappeared from posting. Imagine being that thick and useless that instead of putting up a coherent argument to counter posts you don’t like you just act like a total knob and get the mods to suspend the accounts of the people showing you up? And that’s when you’re already using about four different accounts to filter your feeble arguments through. As T.V.O.R said it’s pitiful really and so thoroughly despotic and grandiose. You say you believe in free speech but only if other people say things you agree with. If not, as seen with T.V.O.R, you act like a rampaging despotic nut job.

I see, well there is a right way to go about things and there is a wrong way to go about things. Starting a new account and immediately attacking a well seasoned forum member is definitely going to attract the wrong sort of attention.

The decision for any bans are made by the Mod/Admin team, regardless of who initially reports a post. You would be better to take up any complaint directly rather than try to derail numerous threads which just spoils it for everyone.