Kopek Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 You're missing recall of Sid's posts of some years. He rarely has a good word for any high profile Woman. yet there seems little justification for his opinion. I bet he doesn't even like the new, Church appointed, High Priestess? This is just Sid, mild rebuke when it gets to be too much but nothing vitriolic. It's rather like the mere mention of Rob Collister brings the Hornets out of the woodwork! Must be the pheromones reaching their keyboards!!! 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 15 hours ago, Happier diner said: I'm sticking up for you. I'm not sure why you are being accused of sexism just because you used the term 'she'. She is a 'she'. There's a repeated pattern of aggressive, dismissive language towards high profile women that isn't used towards their male equivalents. 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 7 minutes ago, Declan said: There's a repeated pattern of aggressive, dismissive language towards high profile women that isn't used towards their male equivalents. if only these women knew their place eh ?? typed sarcastically to highlight the attitude of the dinosaurs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 3 hours ago, code99 said: IMHO, what you have said is nothing but a horribly offensive misogynistic tirade. I am still trying to work out why she should crawl back under her stone. When she came out from under the stone she set up the island testing facility. What we don't know it what happened subsequently to trigger the animosity. Seeing some of the other doctor's allegations, it does seem that being outside of the DHSC clique is not a nice place to be. 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 1 hour ago, Declan said: There's a repeated pattern of aggressive, dismissive language towards high profile women that isn't used towards their male equivalents. 1 hour ago, Kopek said: You're missing recall of Sid's posts of some years. He rarely has a good word for any high profile Woman. yet there seems little justification for his opinion. I bet he doesn't even like the new, Church appointed, High Priestess? This is just Sid, mild rebuke when it gets to be too much but nothing vitriolic. It's rather like the mere mention of Rob Collister brings the Hornets out of the woodwork! Must be the pheromones reaching their keyboards!!! Fair enough. I'll take your word for it. I was only looking at that post in isolation. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Power Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 1 hour ago, Declan said: There's a repeated pattern of aggressive, dismissive language towards high profile women that isn't used towards their male equivalents. I wouldn't say that really, some MF'ers don't seem to worry who they offend, although women seem to be an easy target for a minority! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 I resent that remark I am not sexist unless Jason Moorehouse, the Squeaker, etc have recently changed sex. I had a lot of time for Margaret Thatcher no time at all for Theresa May it is not what they are it is what they do that counts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 33 minutes ago, Max Power said: I wouldn't say that really, some MF'ers don't seem to worry who they offend, although women seem to be an easy target for a minority! I was talking about one poster, not all MF. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
747-400 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 4 hours ago, Gladys said: I am still trying to work out why she should crawl back under her stone. When she came out from under the stone she set up the island testing facility. What we don't know it what happened subsequently to trigger the animosity. Seeing some of the other doctor's allegations, it does seem that being outside of the DHSC clique is not a nice place to be. Who is the DHSC clique though, given that there seems to be such a high turnover at the senior mgt team level? If the senior team was a constant I could better understand. Or is it typical behaviour of CS leaders 🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rachomics Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 1 hour ago, offshoremanxman said: Agreed you need to look at the consistent quiet cast members not the revolving circus happening around them. They’ll be the real problem. The rest is a distraction. This might be the most insightful thing you’ve ever written on this forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buncha wankas Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 25 minutes ago, rachomics said: This might be the most insightful thing you’ve ever written on this forum. Must be easy to narrow down the quiet cast members on the DHSC or Manx Care Exec team that are holding open the revolving door 😆 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piebaps Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 36 minutes ago, rachomics said: This might be the most insightful thing you’ve ever written on this forum. To be fair Rach its probably the most insightful thing anyone has written on the forum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 (edited) 9 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said: It’s been very clear for quite some time what the problem is. Like many aspects of government problems seem to survive several political terms and changes of Tynwald or COMIN. Because they’re not caused by politicians. They’re caused by entrenched non elected bullies that the system isn’t actually hard enough to deal with. And accepting, uninquiring and vain politicians? Edited February 7, 2022 by Gladys 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non-Believer Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Gladys said: And accepting politicians? Powerless politicians. Powerless in the face of the bloc of public servants and its system designed to preserve and protect those public servants. With nothing "servant - ile" about them. Edited February 7, 2022 by Non-Believer typo 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buncha wankas Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 2 minutes ago, Non-Believer said: Powerless politicians. Powerless in the face of the bloc of public servants and its system designed to preserve and protect those public servants. With nothing "servant - ile" about them. John Houghton paid the price for questioning public servant behaviours Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.