Kopek Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 30 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said: With due respect and to paraphrase “ she would say that wouldn’t she?” Are you comparing Glover with a ''Lady of Pleasure''??? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Onchan Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 16 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said: But if you did would that prove beyond doubt that the anonymous letter did not exist or was made up? What do you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Onchan Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 11 minutes ago, Kopek said: Are you comparing Glover with a ''Lady of Pleasure''??? Oh I say, steady on. 😂😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Voice of Reason Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 24 minutes ago, Kopek said: Are you comparing Glover with a ''Lady of Pleasure''??? No Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopek Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 27 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said: But if you did would that prove beyond doubt that the anonymous letter did not exist or was made up? You could publish the original? MF represents 97.38 of the silent majority! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 41 minutes ago, rachomics said: Should I screenshot the WhatsApp messages? Perhaps the emails? I've asked (repeatedly) for the path lab to "officially" refute the letter publicly by press release. Unfortunately, they're bound by the rules that would get them sacked by speaking out. I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place. Have you anything to lose? Do it, you may test a few professional friendships but those in the know will know why you did it. And of course, you could redact the identities. You have to bear in mind, some people up there have more faces than the Koh-i-noor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Voice of Reason Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 46 minutes ago, Gladys said: Well, she would say that if she was desperate to keep the job. But she had already resigned, so draw your own conclusions. As I recall, you were quite disparaging, and yes, you should refer to her as Dr Glover until she invites you to do otherwise. Don't assume anything. I do not know if the letter was genuine or not, but the odour around it is not very reassuring. It probably did exist, but who sent it and what their relationship with Dr Glover is we will never know. It could have been sent by someone in the lab, even the head of the lab, or it could have been sent by a porter in RCH. We will never know. 46 minutes ago, Gladys said: Well, she would say that if she was desperate to keep the job. But she had already resigned, so draw your own conclusions. As I recall, you were quite disparaging, and yes, you should refer to her as Dr Glover until she invites you to do otherwise. Don't assume anything. I do not know if the letter was genuine or not, but the odour around it is not very reassuring. It probably did exist, but who sent it and what their relationship with Dr Glover is we will never know. It could have been sent by someone in the lab, even the head of the lab, or it could have been sent by a porter in RCH. We will never know. Resigned or not you would still want to protect your reputation. I didn’t assume anything that’s why I phrased it as a question. Thank you for your helpful answer. God help us if everyone on here who is disparaged has a hissy fit. I will continue to address her as Dr Glover without waiting for an invitation to do otherwise . If an invitation comes it comes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Voice of Reason Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 40 minutes ago, Andy Onchan said: What do you think? I don’t think it would so if I were Dr Glover I wouldn’t. But if it would exonerate me I would publish and be damned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kipper99 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 I know I’m thick, but, I don’t understand people on here suggesting that HQ is bright enough to be controlling DAMBE like a monkey on a stick. He’s not. With every apology to his trade, he’s as thick as pig shit. Not that Ashie isn’t thick enough to be manipulated like that. Actually he’s so thick that no one in their right minds would try to do that. Bound to end in disaster. Wait.... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Voice of Reason Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Uhtred said: When did you retire from your former role as Editor of Pravda? Apologies I didn’t realize it was anti government posts only 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 7 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said: Apologies I didn’t realize it was anti government posts only You've had an account since 2007!! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 15 minutes ago, Kipper99 said: I know I’m thick, but, I don’t understand people on here suggesting that HQ is bright enough to be controlling DAMBE like a monkey on a stick. He’s not. With every apology to his trade, he’s as thick as pig shit. Not that Ashie isn’t thick enough to be manipulated like that. Actually he’s so thick that no one in their right minds would try to do that. Bound to end in disaster. Wait.... I am no fan of HQ,( although I do respect that he tries hard), but I still respect David Ashford. Some people are so genuine they are easily manipulated. Honest , decent people try their best to help, yet are used as tools by a few faceless wankers who will never have their identities disclosed. Keep your chin up David, you are still ok in my view. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Voice of Reason Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, TheTeapot said: You've had an account since 2007!! Yes. Your point being? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rachomics Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Ah, it would appear that @The Voice of Reason is the commonly encountered “sea lion”. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said: Yes. Your point being? Oh, do you not have a sense of humour then? It was just a little joke about the anti government sentiment on this site. Lighten up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.