Jump to content

Vaccine- who will have it?


Banker

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, TheTeapot said:

I've tried looking at it from the other way round. I can't support it. It's asking for trouble. Just think what happens if the gamble doesn't work. 

I don't understand how they (PHE/JVCI) can say there there is evidence when the makers themselves say there is 'no data'. Its wishful thinking, and completely anti-science.

I hope it works.

But the evidence is there for the first shot, PHE is using the data provided by the producers it's not their own interpretation. Arguably (as you are), they may be some doubt about it's efficacy after 21 days but if I understand correctly the biology is the same as any other vaccine program. The body learns to recognise the threat and deal with it.

Do we really have the time right now to argue whether the booster should be 21 or 60 days?

Looks like we're going to have to agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Andy Onchan said:

But the evidence is there for the first shot, PHE is using the data provided by the producers it's not their own interpretation. Arguably (as you are), they may be some doubt about it's efficacy after 21 days but if I understand correctly the biology is the same as any other vaccine program. The body learns to recognise the threat and deal with it.

Do we really have the time right now to argue whether the booster should be 21 or 60 days?

Looks like we're going to have to agree to disagree.

It's entirely possible I'm wrong.

There is evidence that the first shot triggers an immune response of course, that is clear, but again, from Pfizer "there is no data to demonstrate that protection after the first dose is sustained after 21 days'. 

What is the point in running safety and efficiency trials for a new and experimental medication if you then just ignore them?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Banker said:

Exactly correct, should have plenty of capability as cancelling elective surgery,routine appointments, GP appointments etc .

cancelling elective surgery etc when we have 1 COVID patient in hospital is absolutely stupid 

I’ve been unable to get a face to face appointment with my GP for the last 4 months, I’ve been fobbed off and left to do the chasing myself, given email addresses and phone numbers for different departments to try and organise things directly, so I don’t see what’s any different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Apple said:

in UK pharmacists and dentists are screaming out to help out with vaccination programme but NHS not allowing...yet.

Depends on who gets paid for what....presumably here that isn't a problem.

Can't you?...darn. 😁

The Pfizer vaccine is too difficult to transport and administer to ship it out to pharmacies. Once the AZ vaccine is available in decent quantities they will outsource it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheTeapot said:

It's entirely possible I'm wrong.

There is evidence that the first shot triggers an immune response of course, that is clear, but again, from Pfizer "there is no data to demonstrate that protection after the first dose is sustained after 21 days'. 

What is the point in running safety and efficiency trials for a new and experimental medication if you then just ignore them?

But it's not really new or experimental, at least the backbone of the vaccine isn't, that's one of the reasons why it got to market in record time and it's also why the PHE/JCVI and even HMRA are confident in the efficacy trade-off in regards to the 2nd jab. I'll leave it there on this particular part of the debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Cambon said:

So, in one of the press conferences, it was announced that we will be sticking to the recommended 21 day approach. To try and ensure consistency, each persons second dose will be from the same batch, at least for the Pfizer jab. 

Does the two doses being from the same batch even make any sense?  Is what Pfizer recommend?  I can't find any evidence online and indeed could you even regard the same batch as being the same three weeks later?

I actually find the relentless stream of scientific nonsense that Ashford has been coming out with quite scary.  We've been told that the vaccine couldn't be shaken in transit (duh, it's deep-frozen); that the doses had to be exactly 21 days apart (19-42 was what the manufacturers say); that we were following the guidelines on who it should be given to (we haven't);  all sorts of nonsense about the speed with which it can be administered.

I can only assume that administrators are making arbitrary decisions on a whim and then justifying them with nonsensical bollocks which Ashford dutifully repeats without question.  The scary thing isn't that he's weak and gullible (we'd all worked that out) but that the people he's listening to really don't seem to have a clue and don't seem to be interested in finding out the scientific evidence.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worrying thesis just been put forward on Sky (sorry @Roxanne) from a Prof. Richard Tedder of Imperial College, London who expresses his concern that this business of the "half a dose" malarkey may play right into the virus' hands.

It has proved "shrewd" and adaptable enough to mutate in other respects so far; if we reduce vaccine dosage in recipients thus weakening the intention of the vaccination, the virus may be able to identify this and mutate to become immune.

It's a similar scenario to bugs becoming resistant to antibiotics by people not completing their prescribed dose to kill the bug completely which is already a worldwide problem.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Non-Believer said:

 

It's a similar scenario to bugs becoming resistant to antibiotics by people not completing their prescribed dose to kill the bug completely which is already a worldwide problem.

Its not a similar scenario to bugs becoming resistant to antibiotics by people not completing their prescribed dose to kill the bug completely which is already a worldwide problem.

Antibiotics are a treatment (medicine), vaccines are vaccines. You analogy is very poor

A better analogy is showing a child a reading card once and expecting them to remember it forever vs showing them it once today and then again tomorrow and seeing the greater success.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just driven through Onchan and say masks 50/50 with those not wearing couples holding hands and taking up all pavement!!

called for petrol at corkills, everyone had masks on except one old boy and when challenged by another customer he said none of your business and went right up close to him. Noticed that the old boy came upto other guys car on forecourt to argue but he sensibly drove off. 
so unless it’s mandatory these arguments will increase 

sorry posted on wrong thread!!

Edited by Banker
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Happier diner said:

Its not a similar scenario to bugs becoming resistant to antibiotics by people not completing their prescribed dose to kill the bug completely which is already a worldwide problem.

Antibiotics are a treatment (medicine), vaccines are vaccines. You analogy is very poor

A better analogy is showing a child a reading card once and expecting them to remember it forever vs showing them it once today and then again tomorrow and seeing the greater success.

It wasn't MY analogy. It was that of Prof Tedder being interviewed. I'm not qualified to question his opinions. Presumably, unlike yourself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...