2112 Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 There is a lovely article in the Examiner about the CPA election observers, which we taxpayers are paying £40,000 for the privilege. For the amount we are paying, 9 observers are coming to the island. Are we paying 5* Hotel Prices for accommodation and food? I’m at a loss trying to figure out how it’s costing £40,000? Have the airlines jacked up their prices? Are they staying for a week? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyJoe Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 Fee + expenses? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 There was a Report to July Tynwald on what is involved: https://www.tynwald.org.im/business/opqp/sittings/20182021/2021-GD-0066.pdf It followed a motion from Perkins, which suggests it was a government-encouraged thing. It consists of: 1 x Head of Mission 2 x Election Analysts 3 x Political Observers from other CPA nations 2 x members of CPA staff Though given the almighty cock-ups Athol Street's finest managed to make last time, there's an argument that as much supervision as possible is needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 11 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said: There was a Report to July Tynwald on what is involved: https://www.tynwald.org.im/business/opqp/sittings/20182021/2021-GD-0066.pdf It followed a motion from Perkins, which suggests it was a government-encouraged thing. It consists of: 1 x Head of Mission 2 x Election Analysts 3 x Political Observers from other CPA nations 2 x members of CPA staff Though given the almighty cock-ups Athol Street's finest managed to make last time, there's an argument that as much supervision as possible is needed. So we taxpayers are paying a Perkins Tax. Now there is a precedent set, perhaps in 2026 the CPA entourage may increase. The cost will increase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 2 hours ago, 2112 said: There is a lovely article in the Examiner about the CPA election observers, which we taxpayers are paying £40,000 for the privilege. For the amount we are paying, 9 observers are coming to the island. Are we paying 5* Hotel Prices for accommodation and food? I’m at a loss trying to figure out how it’s costing £40,000? Have the airlines jacked up their prices? Are they staying for a week? No, that's each, £40,000 each. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 41 minutes ago, quilp said: No, that's each, £40,000 each. £360,000? Is that Perkins Legacy, if he fails to be re-elected? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 I don't know actually, I just threw that in for divilment. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 Do you think that for some of these people coming over to look at our election, there's a local forum back home going on about them going on a jolly to the isle of man? 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 27 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said: So we are now warned by the police not to look at election predictions https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/residents-asked-to-avoid-election-betting-site/ That's really poor journalism (even ignoring their usual inability to distinguish its/it's). It seem to be based on Andy Corrie's post on IOM News and Politics mentioned yesterday. But they don't seem to have realised that all traces of betting were removed from the site by yesterday evening. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeapot Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 (edited) For anyone who wants to watch it it is on the iplayer Totally awesome and thrilling election special Edited September 19, 2021 by TheTeapot 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keiran Hannifin Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 Eurgh. Don't have a TV license. 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 So when asked about the possibility of a female Quayle thinks the next CM should have ministerial experience, and unfortunately no women have the experience. Says the man who sacked the only woman in COMIN first and then at every opportunity since to appoint a woman chose a man. Men like - Boot, Hamer, Baker, Cregeen, and Skelly. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyJoe Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 I hope the new First Minister will be a woman 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc.fixit Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 Must be a very strong woman, (or man), to take on the old boy's network! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
code99 Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 (edited) 7 hours ago, offshoremanxman said: The BBC election reporting this morning was good but who invited a sanctimonious prick like Phil Craine to participate? Not sure anyone really cares what his view of the IOM is. Phil Craine runs an informal discussion group called ‘Taxwatch’ - https://taxwatch.im/. IOM taxes are currently a hot potato (albeit an often quietly spoken about) topic. To date practically the entire IOM community (i.e., left leaning, right leaning, or middle of the road) have all benefited from our tax regime. If our ‘0%/10%’ company policy is scrapped, almost everyone would be a loser. All four Rushen candidates and even Bill Mummery (a major e-gambling executive) who were interviewed by the BBC, agreed that international tax reforms are swirling and that the Island’s current tax regime is under threat. Mark Kemp, who opined that we could retain our low-taxes structure, nevertheless compared our current situation to that of living under the Sword of Damocles. To my mind this was a very telling metaphor. I got the impression that he thinks that international bodies like the G7 and the EU will decide whether the proverbial Sword will fall on us or not. If they cut the string that is holding the ‘Sword’ at bay, the Island will have to adapt as best as we can. The elephant in the room is the threat that our zero% company tax rate will be the catalyst to put the IOM on the EU’s Black List. The decision will likely be made by the EU before the end of this year. If we are lucky and are able to escape their wrath this time around, undoubtedly that will not be the end of the matter. That is why the next administration must develop an alternative tax path forward (e.g. plan for a tax regime which has a company tax rate of 15%) and further diversify our economy. It would be irresponsible not to do so. Edited September 19, 2021 by code99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.