Jump to content

Airport.


Billy kettlefish

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Banker said:

Liverpool flight now getting in at c10pm , lots of people who’ve been to various hospitals will be very tired with some distressed after being up since c5am

Absolutely appalling a lot of those people travelling on the Liverpool flight will be patient transfers and therefore not very well of some sort . The last thing they need is an enforced delay and subsequent wait to get back to the island . It’s just not good enough . The Loganair team need to both put it right urgently and publically apologise. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, NoTailT said:

I've been on maybe just under a dozen Heathrow flights now and the loads have been improving, that's for sure.

I've only flown City a handful of times and not for a while, so not sure on that one.

July 22 stats show 2651 passengers on Heathrow. Assuming 1 flight per day, that's 42-43 passenger average in each direction, which definitely isn't break even, but must be close.

City is 6 per week I think, showing at 2251 passengers which is 36 in each direction.

I think that when the underwriting was announced, Allinson said that if 50 people were on each flight there’d be no subsidy. So, based on your numbers of around 40 per flight, presumably roughly 20% of the funds will be drawn down which would be c£800k. Some fairly big assumptions in that calculation though!

Hopefully if new FlyBe pick up LHR that’ll take Loganair out of that part of the picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nellie said:

I think that when the underwriting was announced, Allinson said that if 50 people were on each flight there’d be no subsidy. So, based on your numbers of around 40 per flight, presumably roughly 20% of the funds will be drawn down which would be c£800k. Some fairly big assumptions in that calculation though!

Hopefully if new FlyBe pick up LHR that’ll take Loganair out of that part of the picture.

If they do, I imagine a similar public uproar by Loganair as they did on the south coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NoTailT said:

Assume ATC buggering off.

now due to depart 1025 tomorrow morning.

At this stage we don’t know what the problem is other than both Loganair and EasyJet cannot keep to schedule!  You are always so disparaging about Air traffic control I would recommend understanding it a little more before you are so quick to throw stones !  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, IOM said:

At this stage we don’t know what the problem is other than both Loganair and EasyJet cannot keep to schedule!  You are always so disparaging about Air traffic control I would recommend understanding it a little more before you are so quick to throw stones !  

I do understand it. Duty hours. We’ve been over this a gazillion times before, back and forth, the IOM airport has very little operational resilience.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NoTailT said:

I do understand it. Duty hours. We’ve been over this a gazillion times before, back and forth, the IOM airport has very little operational resilience.

So you understand the detailed working guidelines and practices involved in air traffic control do you ? All the rules and regulations of the CAA ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...