Jump to content

Airport.


Billy kettlefish

Recommended Posts

I don't mind paying a bit extra  for parking ,what I object to is paying robbing bastards like ringo for commission   while we have people who appear to be too lazy to provide  a local service or even look at ANPR  system same as Douglas  corporation car parks  it looks like guernsey also have an ANPR system  in place  from the newspaper article 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, madmanxpilot said:

It just means the current situation is going to go on for a lot longer.

 

It seems to matter not one jot, whether you are qualified to do the job or how well you can do it to HR. The current requirements appear to be 1. Do current management approve of your appointment, presumably  in case you may rock the boat   2. Do you tick the boxes that HR have on their ' computer says no ' sheet. 3. Are you our civil service sort of person. 4. Who do you know !

Anything relevant to the actual task in hand comes a long way down the batting list !

Edited by asitis
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Banker said:

On 26/8/2023 I paid ( @ the desk ) £20 for parking for up to 24 hrs .

It would seem that Guernsey is catching up with the IOM . Just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Two-lane said:

The taxi fare St Peter Port to the airport is shown as £6 - and is 4 miles. On a sunny day, even I could make that on foot.

Given that the latest guidelines I could find indicate £10.80 for 3 miles from IOM Airport, Guernsey seems a bargain. 

Though their parking charges get much more expensive for longer stays with £192 for a fortnight then an extra £12 a day with no maximum.  Ours max out at £120 for up to 90 days (and then they sell your car).  Presumably they've got less space and so want to discourage long stays.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, it's that time of the month again and I know you'll all be disappointed if I don't bring you the July cancellation figures.  You'll be pleased to know that IOM Airport has retained its top ten placing:

  JULY      
  Airport Mvmts Canx % Canx
1 ISLAY 107 14 13.08%
2 SOUTHEND 118 10 8.47%
3 HUMBERSIDE 466 32 6.87%
4 BARRA 134 8 5.97%
5 ALDERNEY 406 21 5.17%
6 KIRKWALL 931 47 5.05%
7 ISLE OF MAN 941 46 4.89%
8 BENBECULA 185 9 4.86%
9 STORNOWAY 457 21 4.60%
10 WICK JOHN O GROATS 93 4 4.30%
11 CAMPBELTOWN 94 4 4.26%
12 TIREE 152 6 3.95%
13 NEWQUAY 727 26 3.58%
14 INVERNESS 1165 39 3.35%
15 TEESSIDE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 291 9 3.09%
16 SOUTHAMPTON 1680 50 2.98%
17 LONDON CITY 4016 114 2.84%
18 GATWICK 26715 718 2.69%
19 SUMBURGH 1055 27 2.56%
20 BELFAST CITY (GEORGE BEST) 2640 63 2.39%
21 GUERNSEY 1553 35 2.25%
22 ABERDEEN 5166 105 2.03%
23 GLASGOW 6167 111 1.80%
24 EDINBURGH 10955 189 1.73%
25 BELFAST INTERNATIONAL 4686 75 1.60%
26 HEATHROW 40988 569 1.39%
27 LIVERPOOL (JOHN LENNON) 3146 41 1.30%
28 BRISTOL 7124 92 1.29%
29 MANCHESTER 17607 226 1.28%
30 JERSEY 1970 21 1.07%
31 LUTON 9693 100 1.03%
32 NORWICH 1359 14 1.03%
33 BIRMINGHAM 8104 74 0.91%
34 CARDIFF WALES 905 7 0.77%
35 LEEDS BRADFORD 3343 25 0.75%
36 NEWCASTLE 3778 26 0.69%
37 STANSTED 16970 74 0.44%
38 EAST MIDLANDS INTERNATIONAL 5131 10 0.19%
39 DUNDEE 152   0.00%
40 EXETER 743   0.00%
41 CITY OF DERRY (EGLINTON) 320   0.00%
    192233 3062 1.59%
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cancellation percentage of 4.89% is actually better than June (5.74%), but because the overall cancellation percentage fell from 2.41% to 1.59% this moved IOM up one place along with the usual suspects.

As ever the detailed analysis taken from the punctuality figures is more instructive.  They also seem to have finally realised that easyJet are flying to MAN, so the figures may be more accurate (I haven't cross-checked yet):

Airport Carrier July
Mvmts Canx % Canx
BFS easyJet 18 0 0.00%
BRS easyJet 18 0 0.00%
LGW easyJet 95 14 14.74%
LPL easyJet 101 6 5.94%
MAN easyJet 62 2 3.23%
DUB Emerald 88 10 11.36%
BHD Emerald 54 0 0.00%
BHX Loganair 53 2 3.77%
EDI Loganair 34 0 0.00%
LHR Loganair 62 0 0.00%
LPL Loganair 104 2 1.92%
LCY Loganair 72 5 6.94%
MAN Loganair 106 2 1.89%
    867 43 4.96%
         
  easyJet 294 22 7.48%
  Emerald 142 10 7.04%
  Loganair 431 11 2.55%
    867 43 4.96%
  Charter 28 0 0.00%
  Other 46 3 6.52%
    941 46 4.89%
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over half the cancellations are on just two routes: LGW and DUB.  We've heard a lot about the failings of the late Gatwick and these figures show just how bad that continue to be.  It's actually an improvement on June when there were 23 canx from 132, but it's still dire.  Emerald's performance on DUB has been more variable, but has been almost as bad previously in some months (though June was good).

Loganair's performance continues to improve, with LCY still their main problem.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Andy Onchan said:

Isn't LCY dependent on the aircraft and pilot being compliant with the short runway requirements?

MMP will probably be able to inform us. 

Yes, but I would assume that all of the IOM based crew are LCY qualified and the aircraft are capable. It’s the steep approach which is the abnormal factor that needs specific attention and training for, rather than runway length.

LCY does have higher minima too, so it will likely be more prone to weather disruption than elsewhere.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Omobono said:

what I object to is paying robbing bastards like ringo for commission   while we have people who appear to be too lazy to provide  a local service or even look at ANPR  system same as Douglas  corporation car parks

Does the supplier of Douglas Corpy’s ANPR systems do it for free then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...