Jump to content

Airport.


Billy kettlefish

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Amadeus said:

The stupid and unnecessary standard premium app parking thing is going well then

 https://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/hundreds-of-airport-parking-fines-cancelled-after-drivers-showed-proof-that-theyd-paid-724697?

But it’s a parking app that manages to run fine anywhere else in the UK. But the lazy useless DOI can’t even run a straight through process to the point that they issue 300 fines that are then written off as, surprise surprise, the DOI had already had the money as the parker had paid using the App! Just more incompetence from our shower of shit civil service who couldn’t run a bath. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any plan for the Airport that does not include provision for improving the approach lighting so it is, as a bare minimum, as good as it was before the runway extension vanity project, is not worth the paper it's written on.

How about we install some adequate approach lighting so planes can land more often before we start remodeling the terminal building, AGAIN

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Amadeus said:

The stupid and unnecessary standard premium app parking thing is going well then

 https://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/hundreds-of-airport-parking-fines-cancelled-after-drivers-showed-proof-that-theyd-paid-724697?

A 30% error rate! What organisation would tolerate that?

What has been done to eliminate the problem?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, swoopy2110 said:

It doesn't say what the problems were though. People entering reg numbers wrong from example.

That may be so, but there it is still an error rate of 30%. You might say that it is all the fault of the customer, and that they should take more care. But the system is there for the benefit of the customer and not for the benefit of RingGo managers and shareholders.

If it is mis-typing, there is a system design problem and not a customer-at-fault problem.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Two-lane said:

That may be so, but there it is still an error rate of 30%. You might say that it is all the fault of the customer, and that they should take more care. But the system is there for the benefit of the customer and not for the benefit of RingGo managers and shareholders.

If it is mis-typing, there is a system design problem and not a customer-at-fault problem.

User mistypes their registration number.

Parking attendant can't verify fee has been paid and issues fine.

=

System problem.

 

Right then 

Edited by swoopy2110
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...