MrGarrison Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 13 minutes ago, cissolt said: Also in court was John Aycock, representing former DHSC chief executive Karen Malone. Mr Aycock said that Mrs Malone was advised to appoint her own legal representative by the DHSC on August 2. Interesting Aycock is one of the best employment lawyers in the Island. Looks like they might have told her she’s in her own from now on. He won’t be cheap. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 1 minute ago, NoTailT said: DHSC has lost. If this is the case it’s a matter of time before Hooperman goes. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) 1 minute ago, 2112 said: Nothing on the NPM yet. I had a call from someone that was in the room but 15minutes ago to say Ranson has won. ah its on twitter too Edited August 26, 2022 by NoTailT 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 And now also https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/dhsc-loses-appeal-over-tribunals-decision-to-hold-disclosure-hearing/ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 10 minutes ago, NoTailT said: I had a call from someone that was in the room but 15minutes ago to say Ranson has won. ah its on twitter too It was about the DHSC and IOMG reputation and I think lack of. Repercussions even more than getting rid of a few civil servants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swoopy2110 Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 Great news. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 I bet CM Cannan is going to have a nice weekend. I wonder what Hooperman is feeling? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-in-man Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 I had a phone call from someone who was in another room when this was announced and they said the shredder has now broken. A few staff where on to HR asking about sick leave and early retirement. A couple had said 'they were going outside and may be some time'. At least 20 were removing any mention of working in DHSC from Linkedin and Ashford has changed his number - again. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 I think we need to know how much this little fiasco is going to cost the taxpayers? 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, x-in-man said: I had a phone call from someone who was in another room when this was announced and they said the shredder has now broken. A few staff where on to HR asking about sick leave and early retirement. A couple had said 'they were going outside and may be some time'. At least 20 were removing any mention of working in DHSC from Linkedin and Ashford has changed his number - again. Ashford changed his number, he may need to change his trousers if he is criticised again. I thought that LinkedIn was like a online CV/social media for protensious idiots crawling up the greasy pole. If they remove reference for DHSC then people will ask even more questions of what is being hidden. Edited August 26, 2022 by 2112 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) 28 minutes ago, MrGarrison said: 43 minutes ago, cissolt said: Also in court was John Aycock, representing former DHSC chief executive Karen Malone. Mr Aycock said that Mrs Malone was advised to appoint her own legal representative by the DHSC on August 2. Interesting Aycock is one of the best employment lawyers in the Island. Looks like they might have told her she’s in her own from now on. He won’t be cheap. Or they may be trying to muddy the waters by increasing the number of appeals. Edited to add: Though whether Malone is even involved today is another matter. Gef reported: Mr Aycock told the court that Mrs Malone was unsure about what was required of her at this time due to the unclear wording of a document from the tribunal on August 1. Deemster Corlett agreed that the wording wasn’t the best, but assured him that neither her presence, nor an affidavit form her, is required for next week’s hearing, if it goes ahead. So it would be difficult for her to complain about an event she didn't have to be involved in. Edited August 26, 2022 by Roger Mexico 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrGarrison Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 14 minutes ago, NoTailT said: And now also https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/dhsc-loses-appeal-over-tribunals-decision-to-hold-disclosure-hearing/ Totally correct too However at Douglas Courthouse today Deemster Andrew Corlett told the appeal the tribunal had not descended into an inquisitorial role and that there was no sustainable foundation for the appeal. Ascertaining whether documents that were relied on by the court were fabricated or not couldn’t possibly be outside of scope logically otherwise everyone would just be making stuff up to fool the Deemster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbnuts Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, 2112 said: Ashford changed his number, he may need to change his trousers if he is criticised again. Is he still alive and breathing . Thought he might have exhausted his brain cell trying to work out his point by point rebuttal 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbnuts Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) This is brilliant news tbh. The covering up and the seemingly culture of lying can not go on . Also the AG's office need to be pulled and told this free spending of tax payers funds can not go on. Edited August 26, 2022 by Numbnuts 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted August 26, 2022 Share Posted August 26, 2022 5 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said: Or they may be trying to muddy the waters by increasing the number of appeals. How many appeals do they want? Is it the best of 3? Still it keeps Athol Streets finest in gainful employment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.