doc.fixit Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 Even bigger boss lady? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 5 minutes ago, doc.fixit said: Even bigger boss lady? And open up another claim for constructive dismissal? I have a sneaking feeling that because one of the remedies will be to be able to offer reinstatement, this will be causing some angst in IOMG as that will have an impact on the money settlement. . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Wright Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 4 hours ago, Roger Mexico said: In reality no Minister is going to make any sort of intervention in a legal case without getting legal advice. How else would they know that they have the vires? And in any case the AG actually sits in on CoMin meetings, so they'll get his legal advice anyway. It's long been observed that the role of AG is conflicted in all sorts of ways (even before the most recent bouts of empire-building). But it suits a lot of people to keep it that way. Not according to our Rob “James - as the new DHSC Minister, I can assure you that I have done everything possible over the past two weeks to take this matter forward to a point of remedy and settlement as quickly as possible, in order to bring closure for everyone involved. Unfortunately, there is a single clause from the August judgement that needs to be challenged, and it is vitally important that we get that legal ruling. Your comments are completely out of context, and unfortunately they are based on almost zero knowledge around this very difficult employment and legal case. That said, if it was in my gift to bring this matter to a satisfactory conclusion tomorrow I would - and I will be working tirelessly to get to a point of remedy and settlement as soon as possible.” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxfisherman Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 5 minutes ago, John Wright said: Your comments are completely out of context, and unfortunately they are based on almost zero knowledge around this very difficult employment and legal case. Ace. Love it when government gobs get all 'you plebs just can't comprehend what we're dealing with here'. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holte End Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 11 hours ago, John Wright said: Unfortunately, there is a single clause from the August judgement that needs to be challenged, and it is vitally important that we get that legal ruling. Your comments are completely out of context, and unfortunately they are based on almost zero knowledge around this very difficult employment and legal case. What can be so vitally important about getting this legal ruling? What are Mr Callister and DHSC trying so desperately to cover up.? It is the word' Vitally', which kind of gives the game away. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 On 10/4/2022 at 9:36 PM, Zulu said: What I would like to know is how someone who was medivac off the Island with a serious heart attach and operated on in Liverpool, had now been put on a waiting list both for the ECG 24 hour monitor and the rehab as there is a long waiting list and has to wait at least 2 months for the rehab. Something is very wrong here! If you're talking about the Cardiac Rehab course it's because they run one at a time and the course is about 8 weeks long. You wouldn't want to do that immediately after surgery anyway - need to build up activity levels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarndyce Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 58 minutes ago, Holte End said: 12 hours ago, John Wright said: Unfortunately, there is a single clause from the August judgement that needs to be challenged, and it is vitally important that we get that legal ruling. Your comments are completely out of context, and unfortunately they are based on almost zero knowledge around this very difficult employment and legal case. What can be so vitally important about getting this legal ruling? What are Mr Callister and DHSC trying so desperately to cover up.? It is the word' Vitally', which kind of gives the game away. It’s the “vitally” which makes it art… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Wright Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 7 minutes ago, Jarndyce said: It’s the “vitally” which makes it art… 1 hour ago, Holte End said: What can be so vitally important about getting this legal ruling? What are Mr Callister and DHSC trying so desperately to cover up.? It is the word' Vitally', which kind of gives the game away. 12 hours ago, manxfisherman said: Ace. Love it when government gobs get all 'you plebs just can't comprehend what we're dealing with here'. According to the press reports, even his own lawyers didn’t consider it vital. They are alleged to have said they didn’t know why they were at the appeal yesterday. And it was his vital appeal, allegedly 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarndyce Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 4 minutes ago, John Wright said: even his own lawyers didn’t consider it vital. They are alleged to have said they didn’t know why they were at the appeal yesterday. And it was his vital appeal, allegedly It sounds like the new minister has succumbed to The Politician’s Syllogism - and so early in his reign! Still, at least we know he’s a Man of Action, even if he’s not sure what the reason for the action is… 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 19 hours ago, Gladys said: To what job? Head of HR with responsibility for off island recruitments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 4 hours ago, John Wright said: According to the press reports, even his own lawyers didn’t consider it vital. They are alleged to have said they didn’t know why they were at the appeal yesterday. And it was his vital appeal, allegedly Couldn't make it up. At least he didn't get to out his name on this before next Tynwald. https://www.tynwald.org.im/business/opqp/sittings/20212026/2022-GD-0069.pdf Sounds good but slightly repetitive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 15 minutes ago, Apple said: Head of HR with responsibility for off island recruitments. Hardly an equivalent job and outside of her core expertise, surely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 16 minutes ago, Apple said: Couldn't make it up. At least he didn't get to out his name on this before next Tynwald. https://www.tynwald.org.im/business/opqp/sittings/20212026/2022-GD-0069.pdf Sounds good but slightly repetitive. Love a document without a date. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 22 minutes ago, Gladys said: Hardly an equivalent job and outside of her core expertise, surely? I was joking but actually after what they have put her through I think it could be solely based on her experience gained..better that any qualification. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Gay'n Posted October 11, 2022 Share Posted October 11, 2022 DHSC loses again in the Ransom case: https://www.judgments.im/content/Judgment 111022.pdf. This time it was about a member of the AGC team being required to provide evidence to the tribunal, which the DHSC wanted to be blocked. "While I agree that it is somewhat odd that Ms Heeley was not named in the oral submissions to the EET on 29 July 2022, this does not entail my finding that she was not properly to be made the subject of an order. As I have held, I consider that she was and is capable of providing factual, relevant evidence to the EET." Deemster Corlett 2 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.