Jump to content

IOM DHSC & MANX CARE


Cassie2

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Cinderella said:

What is most notable this week is the vacuum of response from minister/government - the island’s primary health facility has to resort to Facebook to try and staff essential roles. How is there not outcry about this … and how can minister get away with no accountability #rhetoricalquestions

Hooperman is useless in all honesty. You are right. The public are rightly fed up, but at the same time is used to our useless politicos so in turn are rather apathetic as they know what response they will get. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cinderella said:

What is most notable this week is the vacuum of response from minister/government - the island’s primary health facility has to resort to Facebook to try and staff essential roles. How is there not outcry about this … and how can minister get away with no accountability #rhetoricalquestions

Because they are untouchable. Successive CM and mhk's have allowed this to happen. Its the tail wagging the dog, having got a taste for power civil service have been growing there own fiefdom's. To much power and to much money. Sack the lot and take them back on new terms and conditions.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Boo Gay'n said:

...and all underpinned by the snake oil sold to us by Sir Jonathan Michael, the recipe for which was thoroughly discredited ten-year old Tory legislation (Lansley 'reforms' of 2012)...

And most of the key decisionmakers don't live on the island and therefore neither they nor their families depend on MC for their health needs. Hence no skin un the game

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was an allegation that "the department had concocted paperwork submitted in the Dr Rosalind Ranson case."

At the end of July 2022 Expol was contracted to examine the relevant documents. 

"The tribunal has asked all parties to keep three days in November (8-10) available to consider additional evidence to help inform its decision on the damages Dr Ranson will receive."

Does anyone have any news, scandal, rumour, or gossip about this - if legal, of course?

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Two-lane said:

There was an allegation that "the department had concocted paperwork submitted in the Dr Rosalind Ranson case."

At the end of July 2022 Expol was contracted to examine the relevant documents. 

"The tribunal has asked all parties to keep three days in November (8-10) available to consider additional evidence to help inform its decision on the damages Dr Ranson will receive."

Does anyone have any news, scandal, rumour, or gossip about this - if legal, of course?

Think it got moved from November 2022 to January 2023 as part of the Remedies hearing.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Dirty Buggane said:

Then shifted to February 2023 then March 2023 then April 2023 ad infinity. Till it fades into the past and carpet settles

I'm sure they'll try - the DHSC/AG's Office have attempted to have every Ranson hearing postponed since the first hearing.  But the Tribunal and the Courts (when they've appealed) have got increasingly narked about this and unwilling to even consider any deferral.

Four days have been allocated later this month (17-20 inc)  and I'm sure they will try to do everything to try to get out of it, but I can't see it happening.

  • Thanks 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

I'm sure they'll try - the DHSC/AG's Office have attempted to have every Ranson hearing postponed since the first hearing.  But the Tribunal and the Courts (when they've appealed) have got increasingly narked about this and unwilling to even consider any deferral.

Four days have been allocated later this month (17-20 inc)  and I'm sure they will try to do everything to try to get out of it, but I can't see it happening.

We live in hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is one Politician that can sort this mess out in DHSC and Manx Care and that is Mrs Poole-Wilson, I don’t always agree with some of her policies but she is a very thorough and sound Minister.

Her role in DHA is important but could be done by someone else as most of the heads in her Divisions are quite astute.

Just my views which of course could be totally wrong.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Last Ten said:

There is one Politician that can sort this mess out in DHSC and Manx Care and that is Mrs Poole-Wilson, I don’t always agree with some of her policies but she is a very thorough and sound Minister.

Her role in DHA is important but could be done by someone else as most of the heads in her Divisions are quite astute.

Just my views which of course could be totally wrong.

I agree. Listened to most of her Tynwald speeches. Chatted to one of her teachers at Balla...she is seen as one of the top pupils ever there. That says something.

Definitely next CM material.

Just needs 12 others backing her up in there...which has been the main IOM problem for the last 30 years.

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DHSC is responsible for setting strategy, policies and legislation.

Manx Care is responsible for delivering care in accordance with the MANDATE.

Some people don't seem to understand this change.

https://www.gov.im/media/1378423/dhsc-department-plan-2022-23.pdf

One of the aims was to stop ministers and MHKs from interfering in the day to day running of health and social care.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moghrey Mie said:

DHSC is responsible for setting strategy, policies and legislation.

Manx Care is responsible for delivering care in accordance with the MANDATE.

Some people don't seem to understand this change.

https://www.gov.im/media/1378423/dhsc-department-plan-2022-23.pdf

One of the aims was to stop ministers and MHKs from interfering in the day to day running of health and social care.

Yes but all it seems to have managed is to introduce another extremely expensive layer of managers, who for what ever reason also appear to be appointing a lot of friends to high wage positions and not tackling the major problems  and building themselves their own fiefdom. Which in the long run will do more harm than good and prove hard and extremely expensive to remove when the mistake becomes apparent. 

Just sayin 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Moghrey Mie said:

DHSC is responsible for setting strategy, policies and legislation.

Manx Care is responsible for delivering care in accordance with the MANDATE.

Some people don't seem to understand this change.

https://www.gov.im/media/1378423/dhsc-department-plan-2022-23.pdf

One of the aims was to stop ministers and MHKs from interfering in the day to day running of health and social care.

Correct. Is Manx Care then responsible for the staffing and bed problems m In Nobles right now? Are they even accountable for the lack of provision of services to safely transfer patients (whatever age) from the hospital ?

What happens if Manx Care fails to deliver safe treatment and care as per the mandate? Do they get fined (tax payers money again) or do members of the Board get sacked?  Does the CEO and the other Directors have to stand down with immediate effect? Do we still hold The Minister responsible for where we are at today?

An interesting quote from the above link:-

We are committed to improving our culture and supporting our colleagues to thrive within their roles. We do not want to define ourselves by past challenges, or have these represent what we are known for ....

What exactly does that mean or refer to?

Lots of questions but no one is asking them politically.

Yet.

Added - there are a couple or three of changes that could be initiated  to take regarding the staffing crisis in Nobles that would help significantly. But they won't.

Edited by Apple
typos and adds. sorry.
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Banker said:

There’s shortages of qualified healthcare staff everywhere it’s not just an IOM thing , Jersey hiring care staff from Africa to cover shortages 

https://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2023/01/04/african-care-workers-hired-to-help-address-island-shortage/

Very bad in Canada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...