Shake me up Judy Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 The MLP are a joke, rolling up to opine now. Where have they been during all this ? I don't think any politician comes out of this with any credit and certainly not the Manx Labour Party. Like four stoners in a battered old Beetle turning up for Woodstock on the Monday. 1 1 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Grumpy Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 I know a chap who can conduct an inquiry for the modest sum of £0.9 Million and his name is Sir J... Oh wait! 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moddey Dhoo Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 1 hour ago, Dr. Grumpy said: I know a chap who can conduct an inquiry for the modest sum of £0.9 Million and his name is Sir J... Oh wait! 900k - if only top talent like that were so cheap....... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slinkydevil Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 Looking a bit chilly this weekend, so pushing back the riots. Will pencil in a date for your calendar when we can all be available. Anyone who can't make it can join on Microsoft Teams. Don't forget cakes in reception at 5pm for Jean's birthday. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 https://iomlaw.com/2023/05/04/media-statement-regarding-dr-rosalind-ranson/ 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Onchan Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 7 hours ago, Moddey Dhoo said: There has been almost exclusively one narrative in the public domain since the outset. Notably Dr Ranson issued suit against Dr Alexson for trying to change it. While I have no doubt Dr Ranson was bullied and her exit very poorly handled, much of the relevant back story has never been told. Indeed. There are always two sides to a story. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ativa Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 17 minutes ago, NoTailT said: https://iomlaw.com/2023/05/04/media-statement-regarding-dr-rosalind-ranson/ Major, major issues through DHSC over recent years and a complete embarrassment to the island. Dont forget we still have these bubbling away. ”The leading international law practice recently successfully defended the first defendant in the failed manslaughter prosecution of four local anaesthetists, and it also acts for Silverdale Care Limited (previously called Abbotswood).” 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 2 minutes ago, Ativa said: Major, major issues through DHSC over recent years and a complete embarrassment to the island. Dont forget we still have these bubbling away. ”The leading international law practice recently successfully defended the first defendant in the failed manslaughter prosecution of four local anaesthetists, and it also acts for Silverdale Care Limited (previously called Abbotswood).” I *believe* a settlement is still bumbling away with Abbotswood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 Clare Christian is moving a select committee be formed to consider Ranson investigation, government response etc , details on tynwald sute or her Facebook, obviously Labour will support 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cissolt Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 (edited) I wonder why they want to exclude anything to do with the governments COVID response? It's directly related to the treatment of Dr Ranson, one might suggest her treatment was as a result of the government response. Edited May 5, 2023 by cissolt Crop pic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 "Other than a decision directly linked to the handling of the Ranson litigation." Not sure what that means. Did any Covid response relate to the handling of the litigation rather than the events that led to the litigation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ham_N_Eggs Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 25 minutes ago, cissolt said: I wonder why they want to exclude anything to do with the governments COVID response? It's directly related to the treatment of Dr Ranson, one might suggest her treatment was as a result of the government response. if it's related then it's in, if it's not then it's excluded. Otherwise it's just copying the COVID review. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Ham_N_Eggs said: if it's related then it's in, if it's not then it's excluded. Otherwise it's just copying the COVID review. It should be, but the exception to the exclusion is the handling of the litigation, ie how IOMG conducted itself as a party to the tribunal hearing. That is how I read it. Take out handling and it works. Edited May 5, 2023 by Gladys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two-lane Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 What is the makeup of a select committee? Five MHKs selected by MHKs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 17 minutes ago, Two-lane said: What is the makeup of a select committee? Five MHKs selected by MHKs? Thought it was any Tynwald member? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.