Jump to content

IOM DHSC & MANX CARE


Cassie2

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Two-lane said:

Either the points in question are serious, or they are trivial. If they are serious, Hooper should not be prattling about them on Twitter or Facebook - there should be a response from the Chief Minister. If they are trivial, Hooper is being a prat for mentioning them.

Well it seems Twitter is the way for politicians to communicate these days. Look at the recent Raab case across and the detailst contained in his tweets ( sent and received)

Hooper only spoke in generalities, he didn’t disclose the substance of the points in question. So Idont really think you can hang him for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Steve_Christian said:

I don’t agree with your view. I believe he’s acting with integrity. However change is difficult and perhaps staying within a department may be the best way to effect change. But that’s just my opinion. Right now it’s difficult for any politician to do anything right as trust has been eroded. 

He’s another shallow granny farmer with no backbone and he’s just seen his exit route from any accountability for the absolute embarrassing shit show he currently sits in at the DOI. Will he be handling any of his £70k salary back in consideration for his future risk-free status? No thought not. 

Edited by offshoremanxman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Voice of Reason said:

Hooper only spoke in generalities, he didn’t disclose the substance of the points in question. So Idont really think you can hang him for that.

Well actually you can.  If the head of a professional organisation makes serious allegations about the way your organisation is run, based on what the members are telling him, and all you can say in response is that it isn't all true, without saying what bits aren't or why they aren't , then no one is going to be convinced.  He didn't even promise a point-by-point rebuttal.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

Well actually you can.  If the head of a professional organisation makes serious allegations about the way your organisation is run, based on what the members are telling him, and all you can say in response is that it isn't all true, without saying what bits aren't or why they aren't , then no one is going to be convinced.  He didn't even promise a point-by-point rebuttal.

It’s not for the Minister to rebut, it’s for the BMA to substantiate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Happier diner said:

But surely if you have the balls, you can better influence things from within than without.

This is true and what is invariably trotted out, Stu Peters (on here) most recently. But in light of the situation that we now find ourselves in, what beneficial change has previously been effected from within to get us here?

Stu's edict within days of being elected in 2021 was of how long and how difficult it would be to change anything.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, offshoremanxman said:
1 hour ago, Steve_Christian said:

Because it’s been clearly highlighted that the culture and issues are government-wide and not just within DHSC. 

That’s bollocks though. Let’s be honest he resigned as he’s shat his pants at being on a department in this environment. That’s all. 

Aren't you actually saying the same thing?  That there's no point in being a Departmental Member - or possibly even a Minister - if the governmental culture is so toxic and the ability to change things so lacking.

As to still retaining the £70k that's the point.  The whole idea of the salary being unaffected by being a DM was so that DMs could resign and/or vote against the Department on principle without losing about a quarter of their salary.  It was to give Tynwald greater power over the Executive, not that they seem to used it much up to now.

Edited by Roger Mexico
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said:

Aren't you actually saying the same thing?  That there's no point in being a Departmental Member - or possibly even a Minister - if the governmental culture is so toxic and the ability to change things so lacking.

I don’t think we are as Stevie is saying he’s brave for doing it whereas I’m saying that he’s only done it as he’s crapped himself and he hasn’t got the guts for the fight. I don’t think people should be rewarded for that with a cushy job accountable for nothing. If Glover is concerned then he should make public what whistleblowing he is aware of at the DOI and what specific matters relating to bad culture has he been dealing, or is aware of, at the DOI. Otherwise he looks an absolute tit for resigning over something that happened in a completely different department. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr Helmut Fromage said:

With all this going on I think many people have missed the really important stuff at least the leader of The Manx Labour Party is going to ask a question about Bus fares - read the fucking room Joney, read the fucking room.......................

She's cute though! 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...