Roger Mexico Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 2 hours ago, Dr. Grumpy said: Still nothing? Not that I can see. They don't seem to have published the Deputy High Bailiff's judgment in the case of the four anaesthetists either. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Wright Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 3 hours ago, Dr. Grumpy said: Still nothing? July or August, I’d expect. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Wright Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 50 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said: Not that I can see. They don't seem to have published the Deputy High Bailiff's judgment in the case of the four anaesthetists either. Perfected judgments are running between 5 & 10 working days from being handed down and ending up published on the web. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, snowman said: And an accurate time line of the material provided is to be given to a judge, according to PM. So, does that mean a judicial review? Edited May 9, 2022 by Gladys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Mexico Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 7 minutes ago, Gladys said: And an accurate time line of the material provided is to be given to a judge, according to PM. So, does that mean a judicial review? Which judge is a another good question. Are they having to get someone from the UK to provide the appropriate impartiality and assess the evidence concerning possible criminal charges? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 3 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said: Which judge is a another good question. Are they having to get someone from the UK to provide the appropriate impartiality and assess the evidence concerning possible criminal charges? Why would they need to ship a judge in? Nothing was said about criminal charges, but is evidence at a Tribunal given under oath? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cissolt Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 How does he know?! Is he not on the payroll? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 Just now, cissolt said: How does he know?! Is he not on the payroll? No idea. Think he referred to his sources. All sounds like a buggers muddle, again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Johnson Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 18 minutes ago, Gladys said: No idea. Think he referred to his sources. All sounds like a buggers muddle, again. Was there not an allegation of evidence being fabricated? Minutes of a meeting IIRC They would need to get someone in to deal with that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bandits Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 27 minutes ago, Roger Mexico said: Are they having to get someone from the UK to provide the appropriate impartiality and assess the evidence concerning possible criminal charges? Yes because like the Hospital Anesthetists situation they’re now having to deal with proper UK defense lawyers and properly funded UK legal teams not the usual club member kangaroo courts. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Johnson Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 24 minutes ago, Gladys said: Why would they need to ship a judge in? Nothing was said about criminal charges, but is evidence at a Tribunal given under oath? Google says yes - When you arrive a clerk will check you in at reception. They'll usually ask if you have a representative, any witnesses and any documents for the tribunal. The clerk will also ask you and your witnesses if you want to: swear on your holy book that you'll tell the truth - this is called 'giving evidence on oath' 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 13 minutes ago, Boris Johnson said: Google says yes - When you arrive a clerk will check you in at reception. They'll usually ask if you have a representative, any witnesses and any documents for the tribunal. The clerk will also ask you and your witnesses if you want to: swear on your holy book that you'll tell the truth - this is called 'giving evidence on oath' I thought it would be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 17 minutes ago, Boris Johnson said: Was there not an allegation of evidence being fabricated? Minutes of a meeting IIRC They would need to get someone in to deal with that? Late production of minutes does not necessarily mean they were fabricated, not good practice, but not necessarily fabricated. The real question is whether they are a true record of a meeting that took place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Wright Posted May 9, 2022 Share Posted May 9, 2022 15 minutes ago, Boris Johnson said: Google says yes - When you arrive a clerk will check you in at reception. They'll usually ask if you have a representative, any witnesses and any documents for the tribunal. The clerk will also ask you and your witnesses if you want to: swear on your holy book that you'll tell the truth - this is called 'giving evidence on oath' 2 minutes ago, Gladys said: I thought it would be. Depends on the Tribunal. Most have the power to take evidence on oath. Not all do. Ive never taken evidence on oath in Social Security, Work Permit, or Mental Health appeals. I have taken evidence on oath in Employment & Equality hearings 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.