Barlow Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 17 hours ago, Ramseyboi said: Question. Do you think you would have been elected if it were not for the radio “personality” and relatively high profile? I don’t, and that is my issue with the way the electorate are so short sighted when it comes to casting a vote. Most just vote for someone they know rather than the best candidate. Judging by some of the unwarranted venom that has been spat on this forum I would like to suggest that if it were not for the radio "personality" and relatively high profile, Stu Peters may well have topped the poll. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramseyboi Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 2 hours ago, Barlow said: Judging by some of the unwarranted venom that has been spat on this forum I would like to suggest that if it were not for the radio "personality" and relatively high profile, Stu Peters may well have topped the poll. No chance. Doris and her mates vote for recognised names and don’t even read the manifestos or do any research and account for a large proportion of voters unfortunately Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman1980 Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 5 hours ago, WTF said: good point, especially as they're only there for the cock. This comment is beyond belief and I wasn't going to reply but I think that people need to know what you think of women pursuing careers in traditionally male dominated environments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 (edited) 15 minutes ago, manxman1980 said: This comment is beyond belief and I wasn't going to reply but I think that people need to know what you think of women pursuing careers in traditionally male dominated environments. its not what i think, it's just another jokey comment of dubious taste that snowflakes who want to be offended will pretend not see. thanks for the re-post Edited September 29, 2021 by WTF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrighty Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 3 hours ago, WTF said: its not what i think, it's just another jokey comment of dubious taste that snowflakes who want to be offended will pretend not see. thanks for the re-post I spotted it as a joke, from the Frankie Boyle/Jimmy Carr school. I resisted giving it the laughing emoji however, for fear of causing offence by proxy or something. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 19 minutes ago, wrighty said: I spotted it as a joke, from the Frankie Boyle/Jimmy Carr school. I resisted giving it the laughing emoji however, for fear of causing offence by proxy or something. Well, of course, it could be made safe by saying there are plenty of cocks in Tynwald, and a few twats too. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 2 hours ago, Gladys said: Well, of course, it could be made safe by saying there are plenty of cocks in Tynwald, and a few twats too. and that's just the males. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.