manxman34 Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 Just now, Gladys said: Both Judge Judy and Judge Rinder would make mincemeat of Heading. Let's hope Deemster Corlett takes a firm line with this fantasist*. *For the record, I mean Heading not Ashford in this case. Indeed. And let's hope that there is no cost to the public purse. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pongo Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 Mr Ashford should say that it's not his name. Because Magna Carta or something. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2112 Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 It seems that any Tom, Dick and Courtney can take court action these days. If you are going to serve in a government position, you should be prepared to watch your back for those who disagree with you and watch out for the lawsuits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 (edited) 23 minutes ago, 2112 said: It seems that any Tom, Dick and Courtney can take court action these days. If you are going to serve in a government position, you should be prepared to watch your back for those who disagree with you and watch out for the lawsuits. Anyone can bring litigation, particularly if they represent themselves as there will be no one to advise them that it is a waste of time. When it gets to court this week, hopefully, it will be thrown out. There again, there may be proper grounds for a case. Not that I think that is likely, but let's see. ETA. It's down for 30 minutes, so perhaps just long enough for the Deemster to tell Heading to sling his hook. Edited October 25, 2021 by Gladys 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sm-iom Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said: That’s been taken down from the MR Facebook page now. Looks like someone at MR is censoring his comments. Makes you wonder if someone on the “news” team actually supports these looneys? I went back to read that comment again and it and several others had literally disappeared. Looks to me the opposite. They've realised their story was wrong, deleted it (and therefore its comments), and posted a more factually correct version (and headline). Edited October 25, 2021 by sm-iom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 It's a perception shift unridiculise ashie operation carried out by top level establishment stooge heading. How other people cannot see this is beyond me. That's why andy wint was off last week too, he was being briefed on how to run with it. I know most of this for a fact. Stone cold. 1 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sm-iom Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said: Possibly either way his comment made me laugh and when I went back to find it, it had clearly been deleted along with a pile of other comments. Why would they post a new story rather than amending the old one along with Ashfords view? To try to hide their error... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 Was it incorrect or a bit of semantic posturing? He is the named defendant. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted October 25, 2021 Author Share Posted October 25, 2021 Andy was sick last week 🤑 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted October 25, 2021 Author Share Posted October 25, 2021 This news was a gift from heaven for the new room as the latest hot news was about the sex life of Kush the panda and the fact that a third of the Islands cats are overweight, do you cannon blame them for a bit of embroidery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hissingsid Posted October 25, 2021 Author Share Posted October 25, 2021 Correction News room…. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Git Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 34 minutes ago, offshoremanxman said: Why would they post a new story rather than simply amending the original one along with Ashfords comments? They deleted the page where they got duel / dual mixed up and reposted the whole article again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 (edited) oh, at least i got the 'dim' bit right , i'd rather that little worm was in front of judge Dredd. Edited October 25, 2021 by WTF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cissolt Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 It's a bit strange that they updated the story to add that Courtney was an antivaxxer! We all know he is, but why add that to the story? Tabloid spice? Or government spin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 I'm not explaining it again. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.