SleepyJoe Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 Looks alright on Streetview - what happened? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 4 minutes ago, SleepyJoe said: Looks alright on Streetview - what happened? Clearly beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Looks crap to me and it was an embarrassment even in its heyday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 I doubt you were even born in it's heyday. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Buggane Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Happier diner said: I don't think Architects are trained/experienced in designing buildings that look shit and run down. I don't know, look at the sefton site or the whole of the prom regeneration. 🤡 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0bserver Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Happier diner said: Lets just remind ourselves how unattractive and unremarkable (perhaps downright ugly) it is I don't think you're trying hard enough to appreciate this unique building. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 15 minutes ago, Dirty Buggane said: I don't know, look at the sefton site or the whole of the prom regeneration. 🤡 To be fair the architects drawings looked fine. Its what was delivered that is not so good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happier diner Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 Nearly as impressive as this architectural masterpiece 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxchester Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 Minutes from the meeting now online: https://www.gov.im/media/1377986/pc-minutes-26th-september-2022.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, manxchester said: Minutes from the meeting now online: https://www.gov.im/media/1377986/pc-minutes-26th-september-2022.pdf The what now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyJoe Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 10 minutes ago, manxchester said: Minutes from the meeting now online: https://www.gov.im/media/1377986/pc-minutes-26th-september-2022.pdf "He [the representative from MNH] expressed disappointment with the unadventurous design of the proposed replacement, expressing that in such a site, a more imaginative approach should be taken" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Phantom Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 4 minutes ago, SleepyJoe said: "He [the representative from MNH] expressed disappointment with the unadventurous design of the proposed replacement, expressing that in such a site, a more imaginative approach should be taken" Not enough multi coloured tarmac? Also disappointed that no effort had been put into creating hitherto unknown traffic controlling measures? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyJoe Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 The words tarmac or traffic do not appear in the minutes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-in-man Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 21 minutes ago, NoTailT said: The what now? Old boys club full of brown envelopes and nipple out rolled up trouser port drinking dullards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyJoe Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 Don't the minutes suggest that the building is structurally sound and the steel reinforcement isn't necessary? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Phantom Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 (edited) 12 minutes ago, SleepyJoe said: Don't the minutes suggest that the building is structurally sound and the steel reinforcement isn't necessary? Contradictory it seems. Someone said they were required. Then someone else said they weren't. After they had already been put up. Edited October 10, 2022 by The Phantom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.